Shared Flashcard Set

Details

AP Gov Court Cases
Court cases! They are important!
43
History
12th Grade
12/07/2011

Additional History Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Swann v Charlottes- Mcklenberg
Definition
Once violations of previous mandates directed at desegregating schools had occurred, the scope of district courts' equitable powers to remedy past wrongs were broad and flexible.
Term
Gratz v Bollinger
Definition
 The Court held that the University of Michigan's use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violates both the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI. 
Term
UC v Bakke
Definition
Racial quotas in college admissions are not permissible, although a state interest in diversity can be compelling
Term
Plessy v Ferguson
Definition
upheld state-imposed racial segregation
Term
Webster v Reproductive Health
Definition
none of the challenged provisions of the Missouri legislation infringed upon the right to privacy or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Term
Roe V. Wade
Definition
The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Term
Griswold v Connecticut
Definition
establish a right to privacy
Term
Planned Parenthood v Casey
Definition
upheld roe, except for husband notification clause
Term
Gideon v Wainwright
Definition
Gideon had a right to be represented by a court-appointed attorney and, in doing so, overruled its 1942 decision of Betts v. Brady.
Term
Roper v Simmons
Definition
standards of decency have evolved so that executing minors is "cruel and unusual punishment"
Term
Gregg v. Georgia
Definition
a punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances
Term
Furman v Georgia
Definition
The Court's one-page per curiam opinion held that the imposition of the death penalty in these cases constituted cruel and unusual punishment and violated the Constitution
Term
Wallace v Jaffree
Definition
he Court determined the constitutionality of Alabama's prayer and meditation statute by applying the secular purpose test, which asked if the state's actual purpose was to endorse or disapprove of religion. The Court held that Alabama's passage of the prayer and meditation statute was not only a deviation from the state's duty to maintain absolute neutrality toward religion, but was an affirmative endorsement of religion.
Term
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US
Definition
forced integration
Term
Gideon v. Wainwright
Definition
Have to have lawyer provided to you if you cannot afford.
Term
Mapp v. Ohio
Definition
The Court brushed aside the First Amendment issue and declared that "all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by [the Fourth Amendment], inadmissible in a state court.
Term
griswold v. CT
Definition
violated privacy
Term
Dred Scott
Definition
congress no authority to restrict spread of slavery into federal territory
Term
Wisconsin v Yoder
Definition
 individual's interests in the free exercise of religion under the First Amendment outweighed the State's interests in compelling school attendance beyond the eighth grade.
Term
Employement Div v Smith
Definition
Left to the state to decide
Term
Cohen v CA
Definition
the Court reasoned that the expletive, while provocative, was not directed toward anyone; besides, there was no evidence that people in substantial numbers would be provoked into some kind of physical action by the words on his jacket.
Term
West VA v Barnette
Definition
compelling public schoolchildren to salute the flag was unconstitutional.
Term
Bethel v Fraser
Definition
it was appropriate for the school to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language.
Term
Texas v Johnson
Definition
Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment. (symbolic speech)
Term
NY Times v US
Definition
Yes the Nixon administration's efforts to prevent the publication of what it termed "classified information" violate the First Amendment
Term
Gitlow v. New York
Definition
no state shall deny (14th Amendment). On the merits, a state may forbid both speech and publication if they have a tendency to result in action dangerous to public security, even though such utterances create no clear and present danger.
Term
Schenck v. US
Definition
mailed circulars to draftees was not constitutional
Term
Tinker v. Des Moines
Definition
The wearing of armbands was "closely akin to 'pure speech'" and protected by the First Amendment.
Term
Everson v. Board of Education
Definition
A New Jersey law allowed reimbursements of money to parents who sent their children to school on buses operated by the public transportation system. Children who attended Catholic schools also qualified for this transportation subsidy.
did not violate constitution
Term
Abington v. Schempp
Definition
The required activities encroached on both the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment since the readings and recitations were essentially religious ceremonies and were "intended by the State to be so.
Term
Miller v. California
Definition
obscene materials did not enjoy First Amendment protection. (miller test - whether speech is protected or unprotected under free speech. Has to have redeeming value if obscene. Apply community standards)
Term
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Definition
(lemon test) (1st and 14th amendent)
Yes the Rhode Island and Pennsylvania statutes violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause by making state financial aid available to "church- related educational institutions
Term
Engel v. Vitale
Definition
Neither the prayer's nondenominational character nor its voluntary character saves it from unconstitutionality.
Term
Wesberry v. Sanders
Definition
The Court held that Georgia's apportionment scheme grossly discriminated against voters in the Fifth Congressional District.
Term
Shaw v. Reno
Definition
The Court held that although North Carolina's reapportionment plan was racially neutral on its face, the resulting district shape was bizarre enough to suggest that it constituted an effort to separate voters into different districts based on race
Term
Buckley v. Valeo
Definition
It held that restrictions on individual contributions to political campaigns and candidates did not violate the First Amendment.
Term
Baker v.Carr
Definition
legislative apportionment was a justiciable issue. Brennan concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection issues which Baker and others raised in this case merited judicial evaluation
Not a political issue, but it's under the supreme court's jurisdiction.
Term
Korematsu v. US
Definition
The Court sided with the government and held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Korematsu's rights.
Term
McCulloch v. Maryland
Definition
The Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers.
Term
US v. Lopez
Definition
Unconstitutional: The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
Term
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Definition
Taney reached the conclusion that no person descended from an American slave had ever been a citizen for Article III purposes.
Term
Gibbons v. Ogden
Definition
Fed gov. Controls interstate commerce. The Court found that New York's licensing requirement for out-of-state operators was inconsistent with a congressional act regulating the coasting trade. The New York law was invalid by virtue of the Supremacy Clause.
Term
Barron v. Baltimore
Definition
The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution's Bill of Rights restricts only the powers of the federal government and not those of the state governments.
Supporting users have an ad free experience!