Term
|
Definition
Yewen v Noakes - right to control nature of work
Cassidy v MOH - surgeon not controlled but still employee
Short v Henderson – selection, dismissal, wages, method |
|
|
Term
| Integration Test + (Economic Reality) |
|
Definition
McDonnell and Evans - Denning: integral to business
Montreal Locomotive – X acting for superior or himself? |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Market Investigations - CHIPRIP
Lee v Chung – stonemason clearly working for superior
Ready Mixed Concrete – consistent with employment
Biffa Waste – (integration argument) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
JGE – akin to employment
Various Claimants – L Phillips affirmed JGE |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Mersey Docks and Harbour Road - crane employer 1 paid wages
Viasystems - both employers controlled = both liable |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Storey v Ashton - frolic of his own
Salmond test - authorized wrongs / unauthorized way of authorized
Century Insurance - cigarette explosion (within)
Beard v London Omnibus - conductor drove (outside)
Smith v Stages - driving home from work, crash (within) |
|
|
Term
| Express Prohibitions / Criminal Acts |
|
Definition
Rose v Plenty - milk float boy (within)
Twine v Bean's Express - used van to give lift (outside)
__
Poland v Parr - struck suspected thief, amputation (within) |
|
|
Term
| Employment: Close Connection Test |
|
Definition
Lister v Hesley Hall - warden pervert failed Salmond
Mattis v Pollock - crazy bouncer knife
N v CC Merseyside - police raped, not connection just opportunity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Faraj - duties are usually delegable
McDermid v Nash - sailing provide safe system
Biffa Waste – could sue ICs for ultra-ultra-hazardous shit |
|
|
