Term 
        
        | traditionalist opinion of the Cold War |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        The Cold War was caused by the Soviets.  
The Soviet Union was an expansionist nation, primarily responsible for political and military contention, a real global communist threat to independent nations.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | revisionists opinion of the Cold War |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        The US was also largely to blame for the Cold War. 
The US's unreasonable hostility to communism caused the Russians to also not play nice. Revisionists saw the US as actively expanding and the SU as responding in response to that.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Post-revisionist view of the cause of the Cold War |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | Combination of traditionalist & revisionist viewpoint. Believe that both powers are to blame |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Thorized by G. Allison, a model to explain the Cuban Missile Crisis. 
  
Says that foreign policy was rational and purposeful. The actors  were unified national governments  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | idealism of preponderance |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        think-->"idealism preponderance", the ideal of preponderance 
  
formed by Reus-Smit 
  
Says that American values are universal, attractive to everyond and valid world wide 
  
U.S. is the unipolar power and has te right to act unilaterally, we won't face resistance overseas.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        literally think: blow-back 
  
It is the unintended consequences of covert activities. Blockback occurs when the government hides activities from the public.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | C. Johnson says that although blowback occurs in many countires, the U.S. is definitely the main contender |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The distribution of power in which one state exercise the most economic, militarial, and cultural power. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | Johnson believes that America's hegemony status in the world constitutes a new form of the term "emprie". America's dominance is not through colonial/imperial control like historical empires, but instead is an economical and militarial empire.He also says that America is a concealed empire, ppl aren't fully aware of it. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        coined by V. de Grazia 
  
The idea that America is a Market MEmpire due to the spread of U.S. consumer goods  culture. de Grazia says it is achieved by U.S. firms and mass market.  
  
This is in contrast to Johnson's view of America as an overall empire. 
  
   |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        The idea that America has opposing/a variety of values 
  
 He says that these oposing values eliect dif. reactions from individuals and groups around the world. 
  
think: poly-multiple, valence-atoms hitting each other  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Barber 
  
Actors: subnational fractions vs. MNC's and intl. banks 
Motivations: "parochial hatreds" vs. capitaism 
Theoretical Perpsectives: consturctivism&domestic politics vs commercial liberalism 
Predictions: differntiation vs. convergence 
  
- Barber says that both undermine sovereignty 
- That both don't need democracy  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        think: electicism-->scatteredness,everthing combined; analytic-->theories/perspectives 
  
combining elements of realism, libealism, and constructivism to produce complex mid-range explanations  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | consequences of globalization |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by T. Harrison 
  
Says that the international trading/selling of organs is due to globalization & capitalism. This inhumane trade is a result of the unequal relationship b/t developing and developed states. (capitalism). 
  
This is a Marxist idea.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Gilpin's thoughts on MNCs and states |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        The state has more power than MNC's in the intl economy, MNCs are instruments of the state. 
  
States create a framework for MNC's and dictate their opportunities  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Hymer's thoughts on MNCs and states |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        MNC's are more powerful than states in the intl. economy. 
  
MNC's weaken the sovereignty of states, esp. developing ones. 
  
MNC's create a 3-level hierarchy  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Level 1 : Top management, strategizing and planning - Global capitals 
Level 2: Middle managers, coordinate level 3 - regional capitals 
Level 3: Day-to-Day Operations, labor and production - rest of world 
  
Similar to Wallerstein's core vs. semi-periphery vs. periphery  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | Cosmopolitan notions of human equality underlying humanitarian intervention today, may ultimately impede military success and actually increase casulaties instead of reducint them. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        influences/constrains state behavior, but does NOT determine it 
  
comparison between 19th centrury & 1945 onwards: 
19th cent - intervention mainly to protect white Christians; 
               often multilateral but not neeed for legitimacy; 
                great powers 
1945 - expanded to encompass a wide group of 
          individuals multilateralism needed for legitimacy; 
          great powers 
  
   |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Rational Policy Model (Model 1) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Foreign policy was rational and purposeful. 
  
actors: unified national government (think unified-->rational)  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Organizational Procss model (Modle II) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by G. Allison 
  
Foreign policy = outputs of alrge organizations acting according to standard  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Bureaucratic Politics Model (Model III) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | Foreign Policy = outcomes of bargaining gains among multipleactors (who may not be rational) |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by Weldes 
  
national interets = clear, obvious, & natural  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | "constructing the National Interest" |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | national interest is constructed by state officials |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Psychology of Soviet leaders - Kennan |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        
- they are power hungry
 
- insecure
 
  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Key factors impacting Soviet thinking and behavior |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by Kenan 
  
- innate antagonism b/t socialism and capitalism
 
- Infallibility of Soviet leaders
 
- Soviet leaders construct of "truth" instrumentaly
 
- Iron discipline
 
  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | "Road map" for U.S. Policy |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by Kennan 
  
- Be vigilant and paients
 
- Wait for Soveit Union to reform within
 
- Let there be space for Russian prestige / negotiate with them
 
  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Perrow's Explanations of the Global Financial Crisis |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Like a hierarchy 
- Nominal Accidental Theory: Financial systems are so complex and interconnected that financial crisis are inevitable (rare though), they are built into the system.
 
- Neo-Institutional Theory: The problematic and unquestional norms & ideologies in the intl. economy shapes agents --> agents are victims
 
- Agentic Explanation: Aware agents are knowingly taking these risk
 
  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        used by Gaddis 
  
The study of systems in general with the goal of forming principles that can be applied to all principles  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the stabilizing effect of a systems stucture, system theory |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by Gaddis 
  
The bipolar structure of the world system (Soviet & US) contributed to stability. A bipolar world is more stable b/c there are only two competing powers, more simple (& change is tolerable). Also each state is independent of the other economically (can take care of itself) and geographically so.  |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | stabilizing effect of behavior, state system |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        by Gaddis 
  
- a hesitance to use nuclear weapons
 
- the increased availability of information on states capibilities due to improved technology --> less wortty about surprse activites
 
- moderation of ideologies, policies that are not dictated by ideology are stabilizing
 
 
   |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | stabilizing effect of rules, state system |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | they set a standard for what acceptable behavior is, and states understand that it is in their best interest to follow this standard so that they are treated in the same way |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        (Jervis brings it up) 
  
a group of states among whom war between them is unthinkable  |  
          | 
        
        
         |