Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy in which a speaker jumps to a general conclusion on insufficient evidence. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy in which a speaker mistakenly assumes that because one event follows another, the first event is the cause of the second. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| An analogy in which the two cases being compared are not essentially alike. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when there are more. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy which assumes that something old is automatically better than something new. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A fallacy which assumes that something new is automatically better than something old. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The name used by Aristotle for what modern students of communication refer to as emotional appeal. |
|
|
