Term
| How many crimes in England could you have been hanged for? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Father of modern criminal justice |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Police in London England were called |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many principles of policing? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| When was the federal Marshall's established? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Original town marshall
-Was the first chief to have bikes
-had redlights installed
-Came up with Modus Operandi
-Hired criminals
-Began police school
-Loved hiring college students |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -More emphasis on problem-solving than arresting |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-President Hoover
-War on crime |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -Established in 1929, President Hoover did so pursuant to an act of Congress and the 11 members of the Commission were charged with "studying exhaustively the entire problem of the enforcement of our laws and the improvement of our judicial system, including the special problem and abuses growing out of the prohibition laws." |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -Had high standards and physical fitness |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Where is our state academy? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are the minimum amount of hrs per year of training an officer must have? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are Georgia's two Senators? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many sheriff depts are in the state of georgia? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many cities in the state of Georgia? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many state police are there in the US |
|
Definition
| 49;Hawaii doesnt have one |
|
|
Term
| How many police depts are there in the us |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many policemen are there? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Which state has the most police depts? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How many sworn law enforcement agencies are there in the US? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Who is the most powerful law enforcement officer in each state? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Police depts resources are in what? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Who found investigative and criminal techniques? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Appointed directer of the lab |
|
Definition
-Calvin Goddard
-Raised status of firearm ID |
|
|
Term
| What do most police have? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Investigative stages and activities |
|
Definition
-Preliminary Investigation
-Continuing Investigation
-Focus of Investigation |
|
|
Term
| How many cities are in the US? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-England and wales
Three departments are jointly responsible for the Criminal Justice System (CJS) and its agencies: the Ministry of Justice which oversees the magistrates' courts, the Crown Court, the Appeals Courts, the Legal Services Commission and the National Offender Management Service (including prisons and probation); the Home Office which oversees the police and the Attorney General's Office which oversees the Crown Prosecution Service, the Serious Fraud Office and the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. |
|
|
Term
| What is the criminal justice system modeled after |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Who does the secret service guards? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Police department chain of command |
|
Definition
-quasi-military
-Pyramid
-Lowest to greatest:
-Administrators, Mid-level Managers (unit of commanders), and Supervisors |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -an organizational principle dictating that every officer should report to one and only one superior until that superior officer is relieved |
|
|
Term
| Most people have contact with police where? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What do the police have the most of? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-The experiment began in October 1972 and continued through 1973; it was administered by the Kansas City Police Department and evaluated by the Police Foundation.
Patrols were varied within 15 police beats. Routine preventive patrol was eliminated in five beats, labeled "reactive" beats (meaning officers entered these areas only in response to calls from residents). Normal, routine patrol was maintained in five "control" beats. In five "proactive" beats, patrol was intensified by two to three times the norm.
The experiment asked the following questions:
Would citizens notice changes in the level of police patrol?
Would different levels of visible police patrol affect recorded crime or the outcome of victim surveys?
Would citizen fear of crime and attendant behavior change as a result of differing patrol levels?
Would their degree of satisfaction with police change?
Information was gathered from victimization surveys, reported crime rates, arrest data, a survey of local businesses, attitudinal surveys, and trained observers who monitored police-citizen interaction. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which passed 5–4. The Court held that both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| s a 1969 Supreme Court of the United States case. In Chimel, the Court held that police officers arresting a person in his or her home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, although they may search the area within immediate reach of the person. The rule relating to searches incident to a lawful arrest within the home is now known as the Chimel rule. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment.[1] It also prevented local officers from securing evidence by means prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to their federal colleagues. It was not until the case of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), that the exclusionary rule was deemed to apply to state courts as well. |
|
|
