Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Phil180 - Fallacies
jimmin
16
Philosophy
1st Grade
02/03/2009

Additional Philosophy Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
genetic fallacy
Definition
Instead of attacking the argument, the source of an argument is attacked i.e. attack the newspaper instead of the article's argument
Term
fallacy of composition
Definition
assumption that whats true of the parts is true of the whole
Term
fallacy of division
Definition
what is true of the whole is true of the parts ex: if class average is B, and you are in class, then you got a B
Term
ad hominem
Definition
attacking the person instead of attacking the argument
Term
equivication
Definition
A term is used in 2 different senses in the course of an argument ex: A feather is light. What is light cannot be dark. Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.
Term
appeal to popularity
Definition
Argue with a reason like “everyone likes it” or “Everybody’s doing it”
Term
appeal to emotion
Definition
appeal by playing on the emotions of the listner...by force or by pity
Term
argument from ignorance
Definition
Argument that something is true or false simply because it has not been disproven
Term
appeal to tradition
Definition
Persuade someone to do something b/c that’s the way it has always been done
Term
straw man
Definition
Occurs when you attribute something the arguer isn’t arguing for to them, and attack the unrelated topic ex: senator is arguing for universal health care; but that is like arguing for socialism; socialism is something that we must avoid.
Term
red herring
Definition
Arguer focuses attention somewhere else
Term
begging the question
Definition
restating the conclusion (if p, then p)
Term
faulty analogy
Definition
Thing alike in one respect are assumed to be alike in other respects
Term
false dilemma
Definition
Ignoring other options Ex: either your with us or against us (ignoring neutral)
Term
slippery slope
Definition
if a then b, if b then c, if c then d; we dont want d, so therefore not a
Term
hasty generalization
Definition
occurs when there is insufficient evidence in supporting a claim. either the sample is too small or not representative ex: 30 of 40 philosophy majors said they voted democrat. Thus, the university is 75% democratic.
Supporting users have an ad free experience!