Term
| what questions should we ask when evaluating a systematic review or meta analysis |
|
Definition
| is a clear question identified, were relivent studies skipped over, what was the criteria to select the studies, were the studies chosen appriorate, were the results similar between studies, did the studies valid to the question they asked |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| proportion of people with a disease with a positive test result |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| proportion of people without a disease with a negative test result |
|
|
Term
| how do you calculate sensitivity |
|
Definition
| disease patient with positive result / (disease patient with positive result + disease patient with negative result) |
|
|
Term
| how do you calculate specificity |
|
Definition
| well patient with negative result / (well patient with negative result + well patient with positive result) |
|
|
Term
| in a uriscreen test for UTI if the sensitivity is 100% what does that mean |
|
Definition
| all people with UTI tested positive |
|
|
Term
| in a urine screen test for UTI if the specificity is 68% what does that mean |
|
Definition
| 3% of people tested false positive |
|
|
Term
| if there is a high sensitivity and a negative result what does that mean for the test result |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| in a test for UTI the sensitivity is 27% what does that mean |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| in a test for UTI the specificity is 94% what does that mean |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| if there is high specificity and a positive test result what does that mean about the result |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| what can cause variance of positive perdictive value and negative perdictive value |
|
Definition
| changing prevlence of the disease |
|
|
