Term
|
Definition
Donoghue v Stevenson - L Atkin: neighbour
Caparro - foreseeable, proximate, FJR
Perret - incremental |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Nettleship - driving
Dorset Yacht - prison guards
Carmarthenshire - parent child
Hudson - emplyer/employee |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Smith v Littlewoods - L. Goff: no for pure omissions unless created
Stovin v Wise - L Hoffman - unFJR |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Roe v MOH - undetectable chemical, no liability
Fardon - 'reasonable probabilities not possibilities'.
Vacwell - type of harm eg explosion
Haley - blind man in road |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
re Polemis - any damage foreseen
Wagon Mound 1 - type of harm
Hughes v L Advocate - method unseen but PI
Jolley v Sutton – method unseen but type foreseen
Tremain v Pike - if wrong disease > no liability |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Hedley Byrne
Walton - environmental health
Chaudry - friend car advice
Cornish - mortgage bank clerk
Caparro |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Stansbie v Troman - unless to prevent exactly that
King v Liverpool - no duty to others' proprerty
Mitchell v Glasgow - no for criminal act unless created |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
White v Jones - will inheritance, special relationship
Islington v UCL – no, too remote
Goodwill – to unidentified partner (vasectomy)
Spring v Guardian Assurance |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Blyth - Reasonable man (Aldershot B)
Hall v Brooklands - Green LJ: Clapham omnibus
Glasgow Corp - 'free from over apprehension/confidence' |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Smith v Leech Brain - molten cancer predisposed
Robinson v Post Office- tetanus jab bad reaction
Brice v Brown - weak emotionally |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Liesbosch - hiring dredger no liability
--
Lagden - car hire: 'take victim as you find him' |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Bolton v Stone - rare cricket balls
Miller v Jackson - frequent balls
Paris v Stepney - one eyed man |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Latimer - sawdust, cost of closing
Palmer - 300 kids not disproportionate
Australian Red Cross - HIV screening not dis.
Watt/Ward - fire truck/red light
DABORN v Bath - Asquith LJ: important purpose = abnormal risk.
LEARNED HAND |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Bolam - body of men
Bolitho - withstand logical assessment
Wilsher - junior doctor = real doctor
(Adams - double-glazing)
Mullin v Richards - reasonable 15yo girls
Woolridge - sporting standard lower |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Cork v Kirby - Denning but-for
Barnett v Chelsea - arsenic
Mcwilliam - Harness |
|
|
Term
| Novus Actus (general and nature) |
|
Definition
Performance Cars - 1st crash liable
Baker // Jobilng - amputation / back disease
Fitzgerald - one big accident = all liable
Carslogie - storm not NA |
|
|
Term
| Novus Actus (Claimant or 3rd Party) |
|
Definition
Mckew - leg stairs
Wieland – neck-brace is not NA
Corr - suicide is not NA
----
Knightley v Jones - police tunnel (foreseeable)
Lamb v Camden - if foreseeable
Rouse - doctor unless grossly negligent
Oropesa - necessity not NA |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Bonnington Castings - materially contributed
Wilsher - more probable = substantial causes
Mcghee - materially increase risk
Farichild - Bingham test > liable
Barker v Cory - split liability
s3 Compensation ACt 2006 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Gregg v Scott - less than 50% = no liability
Allied Maple – must demonstrate substantial chance for PEL
Chester v Afshar - 1%: vindication of rights liability |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Scott v St Cat - sugar shouldn't fall
Eason - D in control
Barkway - cause unknown
Ward v Tesco - yoghurt on floor
Cassidy - stiff fingers
Ng Chun Pui - burden of proof unreversed |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Congenital Disabilities Act 1976
Mcfarlane v Tayside - only pain not cost
Parkinson - diabled baby more
Rees - disabled mum no more
Goodwill – no to unidentified partner
Mckay - being alive NO |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Hill - police only to public at large
Osman - teacher threat no duty (Bingham wrong)
Van Colle - witness killed. Potentially HRA 2.
Smith v Sussex Police - no to victims, detrimental |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Osman v UK - HRA 6 blanket immunity from Caparro
Z v UK - HRA 3 and 13, degrading without remedy.
D v East Berks - HRA should be in negligence |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Capital Counties - fire brigade only make worse
Kent - ambulance yes once call accepted
Barret v Enfield - only if careless power
Nicholas H - ship unFJR |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Haynes v Harwood - horse
Harrison v British Railway Board- rescuers foreseeable
Ogwo - fireman can sue fire starter |
|
|
