Shared Flashcard Set

Details

International Human Rights Law
Cases and Concepts dealing with Human Rights Law -- DePaul College, Prof Coll, Fall 2010
35
Law
Post-Graduate
12/06/2010

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay
(HRC)
Definition
Husband moved to Argentina to avoid harrassment.
Kidnapped by Uruguayan forces and detained.
Subjected to physical and mental torture.

Uruguay violated covenant obligations when abducted and tortured citizen living in Argentina
Art 7: ill treatment
Art 9: arbitrary arrest
Art 14: denied legal counsel, self incriminate
Art 22: persecution

Release, compensation, permission to leave
Term
Agiza v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden
(HRC)
Definition
Both men sought asylum in Sweden
Post 9/11, US expressed concern.
Swedish government sent them to Egypt after receiving intelligence info

Sweden conceded risk of ill-treatment but still sent men -- relied on faulty diplomatic assurance
Art 7: prohibition of torture and ill treatment

Compensation, avoid future situations

Flaws of diplomatic assurances
Term
Immigration and Naturalization Services v. Elias Zacarias
(Sup Crt)
Definition
After illegal entry into US, Elias reported fear of guerillas if returned to Guatemala

Asylum application denied
Generalized political motive of guerilla recruitment inadequate to establish well founded fear.
Term
Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc
(US Sup Crt)
Definition
US agreement with Haiti to intercept vessels w/ aliens and send to Guantanamo.
After coup US impose economic sanctions due to high influx of illegal aliens

No violation of Art 33 does not relate to Coast Guard action on high seas -- text not intended for extraterritorial effect
Term
Bankovic v. Belgium
(ECtHR)
Definition
FRY filed app concerning NATO bombin on Serbian radio station that killed 16 people


Court declared app inadmissible b/c act falls outside of jurisdiction of responding states

Convention not considered to have application throughout the world
Term
Bleier v. Uruguay
(HRC)
Definition
Father detained, confirmed b/c authorities read his name from list at army unit

Disappearance doesn't equate with imprisonment

State party must investigate in good faith allegations
Term
Mojica v. Dominican Republic
(HRC)
Definition
Son of labor leader last seen in port
State party does not deny disappearance.

Due weight given to allegations b/c State was not denied them
Art 9, Art 7, Art 6

State must thoroughly investigate disappearance/compensate
Term
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
(US Sup Crt)
Definition
Hamdan set for trial by military commission.
Claimed commission violated Geneva Convention and UCMJ

Hamdan cannot bring Geneva Convention claims -- only states can do this.
UCMJ not self executing -- can say that violations of UCMJ gives effect to the Geneva Convention
Term
Refah Partisi v. Turkey
(ECtHR)
Definition
Refah wanted to allow many legal systems but Turkey attempting to preserve their constitutional system.

Court said would not micromanage decision of gov judges -- they are the ones that know the Refah issues

Court wanted to give Turkey wide margin of appreciation since they are on fence
Term
Bwalya v. Zambia
(HRC)
Definition
Indv trying to run for political office but harrased and dismissed from employment

Comm concluded restriction of author right amount to unreasonable restriction to take part in public affairs
Violate Art 19
Term
Kramer v. Union Free School Dist No 15
(Sup Crt)
Definition
Single man w/ no kids challenged law preventing his vote on school board b/c did not own taxable property or have children

Law no necessary to promote compelling state interest violates EPC -- cannot restrict right to vote
Term
Reynold v. Sims
(U.S. Sup Crt)
Definition
Votes from AL challenged apportionment of AL legislature -- claimed disenfranchisement of black vote

Crt struck down state senate inequality claiming "one person, one vote" -- state legislature must be roughly equal in population
Term
Mathieu-Mohin & Clerfayt v. Belgium
Definition
Petitioner argued system denied French speaking resident living in Flemish region the full rights to vote on matter concerning both regions

Crt said no violation of Art 3, Protocol 1
Belgium is afforded MOA b/c system has built in safe guards for protection of minorities.
Not a disproportionate limitation of free expression of the opinion of people
Free election does not guarantee equal weight
Term
Faurisson v. France
Definition
Prof denied gas executions during Holocaust.
Violated Gayssot Act which made it offense to contest existence of crime against humanity by Natzis

Cmte concluded restriction of freedom of expression was permissible
Art. 19
Conviction did not encroach his right to hold and express an opinion but he did violate rights and reputation of others -- raised anti semitic feelings
Term
RAV v. City of St. Paul
(Sup Crt.)
Definition
Crudely made cross and burned on black family yard

St. Paul ordinance unconstitutional b/c 1 amendment does not permit impose speech prohibitions
Term
Jersild v. Denmark
Definition
Newspaper published article describing racists attitude of Greenjackets
Public prosecutor instituted criminal charges against youths

Reasons for conviction not sufficient to est interference w/ right to freedom of expression.
Means disproportionate to the aim of protectin the reputation of others.
Violate Art 10
Term
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Definition
Appellant convicted under Ohio Crimina Syndicalism for speech during KKK rally

Ohio law unconstitutional b/c criminalized just advocacy w/o looking to tendency of forcible action
Question of proximity & degree
Term
Dennis v. US
Definition
Deals with Smith Act during red scare time.
Petitioner charged with organize commi party and advocating gov overthrow

Court found w/in power of Congress to stop gov overthrow
No violation of free speech
Clear and present danger test
Learned hand: does gravity and improbability justify invasion of speech?
Term
Surek v. Turkey
Definition
Newspaper owner published letters that criticized Turk gov

Penalty imposed on applicant reasonable regarded as answering pressing social need
Reason for conviction are relevant and sufficient
No violation of Art 10
Term
X v. Colombia
Definition
X trying to get pension of deceased same sex partner Y but was rejected

Violation of Art 26 -- application reconsidered
Term
State v. Limon
Definition
17 yr old sanctioned to prison for sex with 14 yr old. Harshed punishment than under Romeo and Juliet exception applied to heterosexual relationships

Harsher punishment for homo underage sex violated EPC
Term
Lawrence v. Texas
Definition
Police officers walked in on two men intercourse in violation of Texas statute
Men were arrested and convicted for deviant behavior

Violation of XIV amend -- rights taken away w/o due process
Statue furthers no legitimate state interest which is the only way to justify intrusion into personal life
Term
Toonen v. Australia
(HRC)
Definition
Toonen challenged provisions in Tasmanian Criminal Code criminalizing forms of sex contact between males

Australia must give effect to rights guaranteed by covenant -- criminal provisions repealed
Term
Roper v. Simmons
Definition
17 year old premeditated murder of girl subjected to death penalty.

unconstitutional to impose death penalty on minor
look to evolving standard of decency
opinion of world community
Term
Medellin v. Texas
Definition
post conviction challenge arguing state violated rights under Vienna Convention -- right to contact consulate

Petition dismissed b/c treaty is not binding upon state courts until enacted by Congress -- not self-executing.
President cannot order enforcement in state crt of ICJ ruling -- gives law making power not allocated to him by Congress
Term
Asakura v. City of Seattle
Definition
Asakura, Jap citizen, brought suit to retain Seattle from enforcing ordinance forcing pawnbrokers to obtain license.
Claimed violation of treaty btw US and Japan

Ordinance violates treat btw US and Japan -- treaty is self executing
Under supremacy clause it trumps state law
Term
UNOCAL case
Definition
building of gas and oil pipe line in Burma. Displaced indigenous people and forced labor to keep project costs down.
Brought claim under ATA

Court agreed theres prima facia showing for jurisdiction b/c forced labor is form of slavery
Term
US v. Krauch
IG Farben Case
Definition
D corp charged one two counts:
(1) supplying insecticide to concentration camp used as poisonous gas (2) supplying injections to conduct experiments on inmates

Corp not guilty of supplying insecticide -- did not have knowledge
Corp not guilty for typhus injections b/c did not know being used for experimentation
23 employees charged w/ slave labor
Term
Goekce v. Austria
Definition
After several attemts to solicit police to keep abusive husband away. He violated injunction, was releaved of charges. He shot her in front of her children

State has positive obligation to protect citizens and ensure that the system responds
Victim continually refused to testify against husband
Term
AT v. Hungary
(CEDAW)
Definition
victim futile sought to separate from abusive husband for 4 years. impossible to obtain restraining order in Turkey

State party has obligation to prevent, protect women from violence
Violation of Art 5
Art 16 --
violation of right to security of person
Term
Maria da Penha Maia Fernandez v. Brazil
(IACtHR)
Definition
Husband abused and attempted to murder wife leaving her a paraplegic.

State liable for failing to perform its duties to regulate domestic violence
Violation of Art 7 for failure to carry out its duties
Term
Maria Eugenia Morales de Sierra v. Guatemala
(CEDAW)
Definition
Petition challenging gender based distinction in marital laws

Court agrees distinction is violation of Art 4
Does not equally protect the family
Term
Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium
Definition
Minister of foreign affairs of Congo was under arrest by request of Belgian judge
Congo argued he had immunity as foreign minister

Crt ruled he was immune b/c head of state immunity applies to next tier heads of states as well

Ways criminal prosecute?
Term
Barrios Altos Case
Definition
15 people were killed at party b/c death squad of Peruvian Armed Forces mistook them for Senderos Luminoso members
Congress has passed law granting general amnesty to all members of security forces

Gov violated Art 8 & 25 when it granted itself amnesty w/o relinquishing power
Term
Azanian Peoples Org v. President of Republic of South Africa
Definition
Applicants wanted direct access to constitutional crt to declare section granting amnesty unconstitutional

Crt upheld constitutionality
w/o amnesty there would be no incentive for offenders to disclose truth about atrocities
Supporting users have an ad free experience!