Term 
        
        | SS Lotus (France v Turkey) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Opino Juris Case Court ruled that it fulfilled only one of the two obligations for opino juris. NO OPINO JURIS Spelled out the guidelines for opino juris. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Customary Law Case The US Court ruled that in the absensnce of treaties on the matter, state practice could help decide the case. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Assylum Case (Colombia v Peru) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Customary Law This case dealt with Regional Customary Law and Persistant Objector. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The Right of Passsage Over Indian Territory (Portugal v Turkey) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Customary Law This case dealt with local/special customary law. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | North Sea Continental Shelf (Germany v Denmark and Netherlands) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Opino Juris In this case the court ruled that TIME IS NOT A FACTOR in determining the exisistence of cutomary law.  They enphasized that the state practice had to be widespread. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Corfu Channel Case (UK v Albania) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        General Principles of Law The court reached its decision by turning to a general principle of customary law. They said, "It is every states obligation to abstain from knowingly using their territory for illegal purposes." |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        General Assembly Resolution The court ruling refered to a general assembly resolution bc they were customary law. This case also deal with US Alien Tort Claims Act. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        General Assembly Resolution The court releid on a general assembly resolution because it was an extention of the UN charter. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        General Assembly Resolution The court relied on a general assembly resolution.  They explained the requirements for ruling according to a resolution.  A general assembly resolution is binding if: Strong Majority and Fair Mix of voters. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Legal Status of Eastern Greenland |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Unilateral Statements The court ruled that even though unilateral statements are not put in writting, they are binding. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Unilateral Statements Unilateral Statements are binding even if the govenment changes. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Interpretation of Treaties Court said, it not up to states to unilaterally interpret or determine the meaning of treaties. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (UK v Iceland) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Rebus Sic Stantibus This case elucidates that the ICJ has the sole jurisdiction to determine whether a fundamental change in circumstance occured. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Rebus Sic Stantibus The court ruled that the Slovakia's porported fundamental changes where not enough to be rebus sic stantibus. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Rebus Sic Stantibus The court made a distiction between political and economic treaties. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Tinoco Claims Arbitration (UK v Costa Rica) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Recognition Court ruled that, "recognition was not required and that sovereignty must be ackknowleged." The court established that the unrecognized government was a de facto governemnt. The de facto governemnt's contracts must be honored. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Recognition Court said, "even if the government is not recognized, but is maintaining internal peace, its acts are authoritative." An unrecognized government is still a government. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | National Petrochemical v M/T Stolt Sheaf |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Regonition Court ruled that unrecognized governments can have access to courts. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Territory This case deals with discovery, occupation, contiguity, and prescription of territory. The court ruled: 1 discovery without occupation results only in an inchoate (incomplete) claim. 2 This case also established that contiguity has no basis in international law. 3 The court ruled that a while prescription is generally illegal, the passage of time legitimates the action. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v Norway) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Territory This case elucidates how important sovereignty is for having title. In this case the court settled a dispute over title. Sovereignty over the territory was the determining factor. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Territory The court ruled that, states can lose the title to territory to prescription if they don't speak up against it. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Territory The ICJ upheld the use of uti possidetis |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        Territory The court used Condominium in this case. Condominium means it is shared. This case is also notable because uti possidetis nor the historic bay concept could solve the matter entirely. |  
          | 
        
        
         |