Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Holdings
Test 1
17
Law
Undergraduate 4
10/07/2012

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Marbury v. Madison
Definition
Marbury's claim for a writ of mandamus is denied because the Supreme Court does not possess original jurisdiction. (Court gains power of judicial review)
Term
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Definition
Appellate power of the Supreme Courts extends to the review of state court decisions that interpret federal law.
Term
Cohens v. Virginia
Definition
Conviction is upheld because state law is valid. Court gains appellate jurisdiction and judicial review authority over state law.
Term
Ex parte McCardle
Definition
McCardle's petition for Habeas Corpus is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Term
Powell v. McCormack
Definition
Powell can obtain his seat because Congress doesn't have authority to exclude members who meet Constitutional requirements for office.
Term
U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton
Definition
Thornton is allowed to run for reelection because states do not have authority to change qualifications for congressional office.
Term
Gravel v. United States
Definition
Grand jury subpoena is quashed because Speech and Debate Clause extends to congressional aides.
Term
Watkins v. United States
Definition
Watkins’ conviction for contempt of Congress is overturned because Congress did not provide information about relevance of investigation to legitimate legislative duty.
Term
Barenblatt v. United States
Definition
Barenblatt’s contempt of Congress conviction is upheld because Committee provided proper information about the link between investigation and legislative activity.
Term
Bowsher v. Synar
Definition
Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act is unconstitutional because the Comptroller General is a legislative officer and cannot possess Executive authority.
Term
Morrison v. Olson
Definition
Independent Counsel Act is constitutional because inferior officers do not need to follow the Appointments Clause.
Term
Myers v. United States
Definition
Removal of Myers by President is valid. Statute granting removal authority to Congress is unconstitutional.
Term
Humphrey's Executor v. United States
Definition
Humphrey’s removal by Roosevelt is invalid. Federal Trade Commission Act providing for specific removal provisions is constitutional.
Term
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
Definition
National Industrial Recovery Act is unconstitutional because Congress cannot delegate lawmaking authority to the Executive.
Term
Clinton v. City of New York
Definition
The Presidential Line Item Veto is unconstitutional because it violates the Presentment Clause of the Constitution.
Term
United States v. Nixon
Definition
Subpoena is valid because the President does not enjoy Executive Privilege to withhold evidence from a criminal investigation.
Term
Clinton v. Jones
Definition
Jones’ lawsuit is valid and may proceed because the President does not possess immunity over unofficial conduct.
Supporting users have an ad free experience!