Term
| 1910-1918 Mandatory Attendance Laws |
|
Definition
-Overtly set aside kids with disabilities, race, non-English speakers, etc.
-State education codes specified who
-Ppl were NOT complaining
-children served under mental hygiene laws in institutions/hospitals |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-veterans came back and had been exposed to non-segregated societies
-civil rights movement
-drives governmental services |
|
|
Term
| Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) |
|
Definition
-desegregation of schools based on race
-If gov. is going to segregate there has to be a purpose, separate inherently means unequal
-Gov. can segregate and discriminate if there is a purpose and there is due process (e.g. prisoners) |
|
|
Term
| PARC vs. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972) |
|
Definition
-Pennsylvania association for retarded citizens
-"uneducatible" ppl are not included in mandatory attendance law
-parents sued bc all human beings can learn***
-ruled that all children with MR btw the ages of 6-21 must be provided a free public education
-States try and re-write the laws to exclude the students they don't want |
|
|
Term
| Mills vs. DC Board of Education (1972) |
|
Definition
-soon after PARC
-class action lawsuit: not just kids with disabilities-> all kids with any special needs
-tried to argue that it would be too expensive to educate kids with special needs
-Courts ruled that was unconstitutional- you can't define your way out of serving someone bc of money cost if they qualify under the law and the law states everyone can learn
*3 things come together- all kids can learn, mandatory attendance laws cannot disqualify ppl without reason, and once you define mandatory attendance laws you can't take them away bc it costs too much |
|
|
Term
| What are the 3 fundamental court cases that led to IDEA? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Why did these cases lead to PL 94-142 EAHCA(1975)(1990)/IDEA? |
|
Definition
-All children with disabilities are now being served in public schools
-The Fed. gov. started passing acts to pay and motivate teachers to become trained in teaching kids with disabilities...also set money aside to educate certain groups of students
-EAHCA (education for all handicapped children act 1975)- required participating states to provide a free appropriate public education for all qualified students with disabilities for Fed. funding(1st emphasis on appropriate education) |
|
|
Term
| Key provisions to EAHCA/IDEA |
|
Definition
1)non-discriminatory assessment
2)LRE
3)procedural due process
4)Free
5)Appropriate |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-birth to 3 yrs of age
-recognition that early intensive intervention has the largest opportunity for making sig. improvements
-before part C- IDEA started in preschool but there was no way of finding/identifying them until they appeared in school at kindergarten |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-kids get an IFSP (individual family service plan)
-home-based/ center-based services
-State has to have a federally approved child find process to get the $$$
-actively looking |
|
|
Term
| Child Find agency and services |
|
Definition
| Services in some states are provided by different departments (department of education DOE vs. Department of family and child services DFCS) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Transition services
-must be based on students' ind. needs and take into accout their preferences and interests
-include: instruction, community experience, the development of employment and adult living objectives, and acquisition of daily living skills and functional vocational evaluation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Evidence of benefit (turned out to be weak)
-emphasizing the improvement of student performance |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| -RTI & FUBA (my book and notes don't say what a FUBA is??) |
|
|
