Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Employment Income
cases
37
Law
Undergraduate 3
05/12/2011

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
S. 4 Income Tax (earnings & Pensions) Act 2003
Definition
defines employment to include
1) contract of employment
2) contract of apprenticeship
3) service for the crown
Term
s.5
Definition
employment includes office...
Term
GW Railway v Bater
Definition
defines office: employment which was a subsisting permanent substantive position in existence independent of person who filled it which went on and was filled by subsequent successor
Term
Edwards v Clinch
Definition
inspector at a public enquiry was not within definition of employment because the position was not permanent and could not be filled by anyone.
Term
McMenamin v Diggles
Definition
office is more then just a job descrtiption.
Term
Davies v Braithwaite
Definition
facts: actor who had plays in NY and UK claimed that play in NY was employment therefore only liable to pay tax on UK play.
Revenue: NY play was not an employment and Sch D should apply
Held: Rowlatt J: where method of earning livelihood involves moving from one engagement to another it is not employment.
Term
Fall v Hitchen
Definition
Professional ballet dancer case.
this was employment because the contract was of services and not for services.
Term
s. 6(1)
Definition
tax on employment income includes tax on general income and special income derived from employment
General income: earnings from employment or anything treated as earnings
Term
s.62(2)
Definition
defines earnings...
Term
Hochstrasser v Mayes
Definition
facts: Co. had a scheme where co. would bear the burden of any loss incurred due to the move, tp moved and made a loss of £350 which the co. reimbursed.
Revenue: this was earnings as it was connnected with employment.
Held: Upjohn J no this was not earnings, payment would only be an emolument if it was made in referance to services by employer this was just reimbursing the loss.
Term
Hamblet v Godfrey
Definition
payment can be emolument even though it was not for the services of employment if it is connected with employment.

in this case a payment for the loss of right (joining trade union) which is a part of the employee-employer relationship was held to be taxable under s.62
Term
Shilton v Wilmhurst
Definition
facts: transfer of a football player from one team to another, the player was given £75k for
held: Lord Templeman - an emolument "from employment" includes emolument from being or becoming an employess, therefore £75k was an emolument of employment.
Term
Maris v Hughey
Definition
CA held payment to compensate for non-statutory redundency payment is tax free. payment was made to compensate for the loss of the right and not as inducement to enter into a new contract.
Term
Wilcock v Eve
Definition
ex gratia payment to an employee for loss of right under share option scheme was not taxable.
Term
Seymore v Reed
Definition
cricket player was awarded a benefit season, he was allowed to receive gate money of one of the games. this was held to be a personal payment and no employment payment.
Term
Moorehouse v Dooland.
Definition
D under club rules was allowed money everytime he played specially good. the revenue said that this was emolument from employment. held yes it was because D had a contractual right which was frequent so taxable.
Term
Moore v Griffiths
Definition
payments made by the football association to mark England's victory in world cup 1966 were held to be non taxable Brightman J: the payment had no forseeable element of reoccurance.
Term
Jarrold v Boustead
Definition
disqualification of the player from rugby union was for life and he was paid for this, this was not taxable.
Term
s. 62(3)ITEPA 2003
Definition
Money's worth means something which is of direct monetry value to the employer or something capable of being converted into monetery value to the employee.
Term
Furgeson v Noble
Definition
TP (police officer) was allowed to buy his own clothes suitable for his job and was given allowance of £11.71
held: taxable.
Term
Owen v Pook
Definition
payment by employee in form of reimbursement was not taxable (car parking reimbursement)
Term
Perons v Speckman
Definition
reimbursement must be distinguished from expense allowance.
Term
s. 201 ITEPA
Definition
chapter 10 applies to employment related benefits, benefits provided by the employer are treated as paid by reason of employment unless proven otherwise.
Term
s. 203
Definition
tax is on the cash equivalent of the benefit.
Term
s.204
Definition
usually the cost of the benefit to the person providing it.
Term
Vertigan v Brady
Definition
Nurseryman's occupation of the property was held not be allowable expenditure as it was not necessary in the performance of his duty.
Term
Pepper v Hart
Definition
cost is the marginal cost and not the average cost.
Term
Wicks v Firth
Definition
Scholorship was exempt as scholorship income.
Term
s.212
Definition
scholorship to a relative is no longer exempt but is charged with cash equivelant.
Term
s. 114
Definition
Cars Vans and related benefits for private use are considered as benefits derived from employment.
Term
Morris v HMRC
Definition
cars includes any motor vehicle.
Term
s.118
Definition
privte use means any use other then employees business travel.
Note: travelling within work is allowed but if it is to and from work then it is not allowed as that is commuting.
Term
Gilbert v Hamsley
Definition
TP provided a car for work, his home was 6 miles from the depot he was not allowed to use the car for anything other then business but he was required to take it home overnight.
held: that this was still all for business.
Term
ss173-191:
Definition
Loan less then the market rate is taxable as the cash equivelant. exceptiong for a loan below £5000
Term
s. 336
Definition
expenditure must be incurred wholly and exclusively in the performance of the duties of employment.
Term
Simpson v Tate
Definition
TP employed by local authority, subscribed to medical journals paid for by the authority, he claimed this was allowable expenditure as they helped him keep up-to-date in his profession.
held: Not allowable expenditure becase it was not wholly and exclusively for the purpose of employment.
Term
Fitzpatrick v IRC (No.2)
Definition
journalist who claimed cost on newspaper and magazines. it was held that again this was not allowable expenditure as it was not necessary for the performance of thir duties.
Supporting users have an ad free experience!