Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Con Law II Cases
Cases
52
Law
Graduate
12/10/2011

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Marsh v. Alabama
Definition
Under State Action -- Exception: Public Functions

Privately owned property may be held to be the functional equivalent of a public place -- in which even neither criminal nor civil trespass rules may be applied to limit the reasonable exercise of First Amendment rights on the property
Term
Jackson v. Metro Edison Co.
Definition
State Action -- Exception: Public Functions

A heavily regulated company that had been granted a monopoly by the state was held not to have engaged in "state action" when it terminated a user's service without notice or hearing because the supplying of utility service is not traditionally the exclusive province of the state.
Term
Evans v. Newton
Definition
State Action -- Exception: Public Functions

A state court's appointment of private trustees, replacing the state officials who had resigned as trustees to facilitate the private appointments, constituted state action where the obvious purpose was to perpetuate racial discrimination
Term
Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board
Definition
State Action -- Exception: Public Functions

Although a large, self contained shopping center is in many ways similar to the business district of an ordinary town, it is not the equivalent of a municipality because it does not possess all of the attributed of a town.
Term
Terry v. Adams
Definition
State Action -- Exception: Public Function

County political groups cannot exclude African-American's from a preprimary election when the winner almost always runs unopposed in the party primary and general election
Term
Shelley v. Kraemer
Definition
State Action -- Exception: Entanglement -- Judicial and Law Enforcement Actions

If state courts enforce racial restrictive covenants by all homeowners in an area by enjoining a black person who purchased from a white owner from taking possession and awarding damages against the white seller to other signatories of the restrictive covenants, there is "state action". White voluntary adherence to the covenants does not involve state action, judicial enforcement does.
Term
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
Definition
State Action - Exception: Entanglement -- Govt Regulation

by the govt accepting rent from a business that did not allow blacks to use their business had enough entanglement for it to be state action
Term
Romer v. Evans
Definition
EP: Legit Purpose under Rational Basis

A state constitutional provision that identifies persons by a single trait and then denies them the right to seek any specific protections from the law -- no matter how local or widespread the injury -- is so unprecedented as to imply animosity towards such persons and is thus not related to any legitimate state interest
Term
New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
Definition
EP: Tolerance for Over inclusiveness

by employing the rational basis test, the court gives legislative bodies wide latitude in drawing classifications when enacting economic and social regulation pursuant to the police power
Term
US Dept. of Ag v. Moreno
Definition
EP: Laws that have been deemed arbitrary and unreasonable

The federal food stamp program excluded any household containing unrelated persons. The court found the classification "wholly without any rational basis". The legislative history indicated that the provision was aimed at excluding hippie communes from the program. The court found that discrimination against this politically unpopular group was not a constitutionally permissible govt interest.
Term
Stauder v. WV
Definition
EP: Facial Discrimination

law forbidding African-Americans from serving on grand or petit juries
Term
Korematsu v. US
Definition
EP: Facially Discriminatory (Excpetion)

curfew orders and forced relocation applicable only to persons of Japanese ancestry was held not to violate equal protection pressing public necessity may sometimes justify racial restrictions
Term
Loving v. Virginia
Definition
EP: Racial Classifications burdening both whites and minorities

racial intermarriage ostensibly does not discriminate against members of one race; it appears to treat both races equally still discriminates and is invalid
Term
Washington V. Davis
Definition
EP-SS: Established the requirements for Facially neutral classifications
Term
Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co.
Definition
EP-SS: because all classifications based on race carry a danger of stigmatic harm, govt action that favors racial or ethnic minorities is subjct to the same standard of strict scrutiny review as is govt action that discriminates against racial or ethnic minorities. Thus it will be upheld only if it is necessary or narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling govt interest
Term
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena
Definition
EP-SS: Affirmative Action

the standard for judging all racial classifications drawn by the federal govt is the same as for state and local action: strict scrutiny. These classifications violate the equal protection component of the 5th Amendment due Process Clause unless they are narrowly tailored measures that further compelling govt interests
Term
Grutter v. Bollinger
Definition
EP-SS: Affirmative Action

Court upheld the AA program at Michigan Law when the school testified that it was one factor in a bunch to consider but it was not the predominent factor and did not only include race
Term
Gratz v. Bollinger
Definition
EP-SS: Affirmative Action

court held that race considerations may not permanently be enshrined in admissions policies, but that periodic review of race conscious admissions policies to determine whether racial preference are still necessary to achieve student body diversity are sufficient to satisfy this limitation
Term
Graham v. Richardson
Definition
EP-SS: Alienage

Most state discrimination against lawfully admissted aliens is suspect because aliens are precisely the kind of discrete and insular minority with no direct vote in the political process for whom judicial solicitude is appropriate
Term
Foley v. Conneli
Definition
EP-SS: Alienage

a state has historical power to exclude aliens from participation in its democratic political institutions. Thus, as long as the state acts rationally, aliens ma be excluded from voting, jury service, elective office, and nonelective offices that formulate, execute or review important public policy -- ie. police officers
Term
Plyler v. Doe
Definition
EP-SS: Alienage -- when it is okay to intermediate scrutiny

a texas law was unconstitutional that provided that provided a free public education for children of citizens and of documents aliens, but required that undocumented aliens pay for their schooling received less then strict but more than rational
Term
Craig v. Boren
Definition
EP-IS: Gender

classifications based on gender or legit are not suspect, but neither are they judged by the traditional test they are quasi suspect which violates equal protection unless iti substantially related to important govt objectives.
Term
Orr v. Orr
Definition
Several decisions have held that laws that discriminate against men violate equal protection
Term
Nguyen v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Definition
the court upheld a federal statute that grants automatic US citizenship to nonmarital children born abroad to American mothers, but requires that American fathers take specific steps to establish paternity in order to make such children US citizens
Term
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Community
Definition
First Amendment -- Content Neutral

content neutral regulations of speech are ordinarily subject to "intermediate scrutiny" and will be upheld if they

advance important interests unrelated to the suppression of speech and
do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further those interests
Term
Boos v. Barry
Definition
a law may not forbid only those picket signs within 500 feet of of a foreign embassy that are critical of the foreign govt
Term
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
Definition
requirement that the National endowment for the arts consider standards of decency and respect for values of American people when deciding whether to make grants is not invalid on its face
Term
Coates v. City of Cincinnati
Definition
an ordinance making it a crime for three or more persons to assemble on any of the sidewalks and there conduct themselves in a manner annoying to persons passing by was held to violate the general due process standard of vagueness, because people of common intellignece must necessarily guess at its meaning. It also violated the first amendment right of free assembly and association becuase mere public intoerance of animosity is a constitutionally impermissible bassi for its abridgment, and because the ordinance contains an obvious invitation to discriminatory enforcement against those whose association is annoying due to their ideas of physical appearance
Term
Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim
Definition
a municipality that permits a brod range of commercial establishments may not prohibit all live entertainment from its commercial district -- at least if such entertainment is not available in reasonably nearby areas
Term
Near v. State of Minnesota
Definition
the govt generally may not establish a system of censorship to regulate in advance what may be uttered or published or enjoin speech or employ other prior restraints
Term
Lovell v. City of Griffin, Ga
Definition
the state may not vest the licensing official with unlimited discretion to determine who may receive permits
Term
City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing
Definition
a city ordinance that gave the mayor complete discretion to grant annual permits for placement of news racks on public property was held unconstitutional on its fact
Term
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
Definition
the govt may not forbid all govt employees from receving compensation for speeches, appearances or articles even when these expressive actions have no nexus to their emploment and thus could not pose the danger of or appearnce of imporper influence by the payor or improper use by the employee of knowledge or resources acquired in the course of the govt employment
Term
WV State Board of Education v. Barnette
Definition
Compelled Speech:

Requiring all public school pupils to salute the flag and recite the pledge of allegiance is invalid as applied to children whose religious scruples forbid it -- govt cannot require affirmation of a belief
Term
Rust v. Sullivan
Definition
govt can without violating the constitution, selectively fund a program to encourage certain activities it believes to be in the public interest, without at the same time funding an alternate program which seeks to deal with the problem in another way
Term
Meese v. Keene
Definition
the govt can label films without violating the first amendment
Term
Bantam Cooks, inc. v. sullivan
Definition
labeling plus can constitute an infringement

it was unconstitutional for the RI commission to encourage morality in youth to identify objectionable books because they were unsuitable for children and to write to sellers urging them to stop selling those books
Term
Debs v. US
Definition
unconstitutional for Deb's to advocate for socialism including some mild criticsm
Term
Abrams v. US
Definition
upheld a conviction based on the fact that it was convicted of encouraging resistance and conspiracy to urge curtailment
Term
Whitney v. California
Definition
speech advocating illegal action may be punished only when the advocated action is serious and there is no time for further discussion before the advocated action will take place. Whether these elements exist in a given case must be determined according to federal constitutional standards, and ultimately by the SC
Term
Dennis v. United States
Definition
court affirmed the convictions, rejecting the argument that defendants activities were protected by the 1st Amendment
Term
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Definition
a state may not penalize advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action
Term
RAV v. City of St. Paul
Definition
a very narrow fighting words law will likely be declared unconstitutional as impermissibly drawing content-based distinctions as what speech is prohibited and what is allowed
Term
Roth v. US
Definition
Obscenity is a category of unprotected speech by the first amendment
Term
Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton
Definition
there are legit state interests at stake in stemming the tide of commercialized obscenity, even assuming it is feasible to enforce effective safeguards against exposure to juveniles and to the passerbys
Term
Miller v. California
Definition
Created the miller test for sexually oriented speech
Term
NY v. Feber
Definition
govt may prohibit the exhibition, sale or distribution of child porn even if it does not meet the test for obscenity
Term
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
Definition
must use actual children in the production to not fall within the limits of the First Amendment
Term
Young v. American Mini Theatres
Definition
upheld a city's ordinance that limited the number of adult theaters that could be on any block and that prevented such enterprises from being in residential areas
Term
City of Erie v. pap's AM
Definition
govt can limited nude dancing -- held that the govt can prevent nude dancing as to stop the secondary effects such as crime associated with the activity
Term
Stanley v. Georgia
Definition
the mere private possession of obscene matter cannot constitute a crime
Term
Osborne v. Ohio
Definition
govt cna prohibit and punish the private possession of child porn because the govt has an important interest in attempting to dry up the market for child porn so as to the protect the children and therefore punish even private possession
Supporting users have an ad free experience!