Term
| Definition of Communication |
|
Definition
| Communication is a process in which individuals employ symbols to establish and interpret meaning in their environment |
|
|
Term
Differences between linear and transactional models of communication |
|
Definition
Linear Model - one-way view of communication that assumes a message is sent by a sources to a receiver through a channel (Shannon & Weaver)
Transacitional Model - view of communication at the simultaneous sending and receiving of messages |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Linguistic influences on reception of message (When Jennifer received a medical report from her ophthalmologist, the physician's words included phrases such as "ocular neuritis". Outside of the medical communicty, these words have limited or no meaning) |
|
|
Term
| Physical (External) Noise |
|
Definition
| Bodily influences on reception of message (exists outside of the receiver) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Cognitive influences on reception of messaege, refers to a communicator's prejudices and biases towards another or the message (imagine linstening to participants at a political rally, you may experiences psychological noise listening to the views of a politician whom you do not support, and you may experience physical noise from the people nearby who may be protesting the politician's presence) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Biological influences on reception of message and communication process (exists if you or a speaker is till, fatigued, or hungry) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Cultur makes a difference in the way you communicate |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Personally influences the way you communicate |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| What is the relationship with the person you are communicating to |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Ex MCD chairs make you lean forward and eat and leave |
|
|
Term
| Communication as Symbolic |
|
Definition
1) Symbole are abstract/arbitrary/ambiguous
2) Stand for different things
3) Random to connection between the sumbole and the thing it represents
4) Open to more than one interpretation |
|
|
Term
| Characteristics that affect Communicatino |
|
Definition
1) Susceptible to misunderstanding - different meanings
2) Irreversible - once something is communication it can't be taken back
3) Functional - use communication as a tool to accomplish goals
4) Learned |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
words or terms that label the most important elements in a theory (variables)
- Nominal concepts - unobservable (anything inside your brain, can't be touched like IQ)
- Real concepts - observable (age, eye color, height...) |
|
|
Term
Component - Relationships
|
|
Definition
| Specifications for the ways in which the concepts in the theory are combined (height is correlated with ability to play sports, IQ and GPA, weight and ability for sports) |
|
|
Term
| Goals of Theory - Explanation |
|
Definition
| Explains why we like opposite sex |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Goals of Theory - Understanding |
|
Definition
| Childhood is connected with romantic relationship. Understanding how parents affect the way he/she view relationship |
|
|
Term
| Goals of Theory - Prediction |
|
Definition
| Combination of concepts lead to predictions |
|
|
Term
| Goals of Theory - Social Change |
|
Definition
| Change that affects society (feminine study) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Paradigm are intellectual traditions, or ways of viewing the world, that are shraed by a community of scholars
2) The world of scholarly inquiry is populated by a variety of paradigms (our lense to see theourh the world)
3) Paradigms are distinguised by their meta-theoretical positions (communicating about communicating/theory about theory) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Assumptions about the nature of human existence
Ex. What is human nature? Do people have free will? (humanistic extreme, not scientific extreme) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Assumptions about the nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (subjective: you create your reality everywhere you go, there's no reality)
Ex. Can people know reality? What counts as knowledge? Is there one universal truth can be known? (Not humanistic, scientific extreme) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Assumptions about the role of values in scholarship Ex. should researcher put own opinion into it? Should they be objective? Are values part of scholarship? (Humanistic, not scientific extreme) |
|
|
Term
| Criteria for evaluating a theory |
|
Definition
1) Scopt and Boundaries - efficient scopt for a theory, a theory that doesn't have boundaries isn't useful
2) Logical Consistency - does it make sense? Should be non-contradictory
3) Parisimony - Simplistic, should contain concepts that are useful without leaving anything out
4) Utility
5) Testability
6) Heuristic - Generates new idea
7) Test of Time - Does it last? |
|
|
Term
| Analogic Codes (Non-verbal) |
|
Definition
| Symbols that bear a physical resemlance to the things they represent; symbols that represent the actual feeling |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Symbols that are arbitrary and do not resemble the object they represent |
|
|
Term
| Digital Nature of Language |
|
Definition
1) Language relies on a common ground shared meaning (two people communicating need to speak same language in order to exchange)
2) Language is a relatively precise symbole system (usually we only have one word that corsponds our feelings)
3) Language allows the expression of abstract ideas
4) Language is self reflexive (we use language to talk about language) |
|
|
Term
| Characteristics of Language |
|
Definition
1) Abstract - words stand for object, but not the things they represent themselves, use "concrete language" to avoid misunderstandings
2) Arbitrary - open for interpretations, ambiguous
3) Related to Culture - create the world view (mail men, stewarts)
4) Consequential - complex reality (dreams) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Totalizing - a tendency for language to neglect or ignore the details, nauances, or complexity of real life experience
2) Reification - reacting to words as though they are an accuraet and complete representation of reality |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Govern the appropriate structure of language |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Govern meaning attached to symbols and how words can be arranged meaninfgully (denotation/contative) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Govern the goals that can be accomplished using particular speech acts |
|
|
Term
| Assumptions of Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM) |
|
Definition
1) Human beings live in communication (create reality that we live in)
2) Human beings cocreate a social reality (social constructionism like emotions, events, self...are constructed through communication)
3) Information transactions depend on personal and interpersonal meaning |
|
|
Term
| Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Content |
|
Definition
| The message itself, message without any context |
|
|
Term
Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Speech Act
|
|
Definition
| What is the goal of the speech? To accomplish? |
|
|
Term
Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Episodes
|
|
Definition
| Has conversations: feedback, response, interaction |
|
|
Term
Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Relationship
|
|
Definition
| History with person we are interacting with. Every conversation has meaning (episodes) |
|
|
Term
Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Life Scripts
|
|
Definition
| The relationships you have with others, combinations of all. The image we want to present to others |
|
|
Term
Hierarchy of Organized Meaning - Cultural Patterns
|
|
Definition
| Our image/relations to the world (culture) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Tells us how we should interpret other person's behaviors |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Rules that guides procedure; guide our behavior during interavtion |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The meaning achieved when a perosn brings his or her unique experiences to an interaction. It is derived from the experiences people have with one another, and yet "it is improbable that two individuals will interpret the same experience in a similar manner" |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Trying to make sense of message sequencing(按順序安排). Coordination exists when two people try to makes sense out of the sequencing of messages in their conversation |
|
|
Term
| Influences on the Coordination Process |
|
Definition
Influenced by a sense of
1) morality - each person brings various moral orders into a conversation to create and complete the episode
2) availability of resources - they refer to "the stories, images, symbols, and institutions that persons use to make their world meaningful". Resources also include perceptions, memories, and concepts that help people achieve coherence in social realities |
|
|
Term
| Social Constructionism(構成主義) |
|
Definition
| Belief that people co-construct their social reality in conversations (Rather than "what did you mean by that?" but "what are we making together?" "Hpw are we making it?" |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A peron's beliefs about how meaning and action fit within an interpersonal interaction. When two people engage in a conversation, they each come with a host of past converstional experiences form previous social realities. New realities will come up in a current conversation |
|
|
Term
| Analogic Nature of Nonverbal Messages |
|
Definition
1) Variable intensity - variation, degrees of expressions
2) Potential for universal meaning - people can understand without a shared language
3) Simultaneous transmission - you can send a lot of cues at the same time
4) Spontaneous transmission - you don't ahve to think too much in order to respond
5) Automatic processing - you don't have to think very hard about other's emotions/facial expressions |
|
|
Term
| Channel Approach to Nonverbal Message |
|
Definition
1) Strengths - easy to examine one behavior at a time
2) Weakness - behaviors do not occur in isolation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Kinesic Cues - how we move our bodies
2) Proxemic Cues - how we use our personal space
3) Touching Behaviors - haptics: shaking hands
4) Facial Cues - facial expressions
5) Eye Contact - how you make eye contact
6) Paralinguistic Cues - how we say things (tone/speed/accent) |
|
|
Term
| Multivariate/Functional Approach to Nonverbal Messages |
|
Definition
Fouces on a comprehensive, integrated description of nonverbal behaviors in the service of different social functions
1) Strengths - Patterns are what determine meaning; focuses attentino on the functions of messages (looking at all cues, focus on functions first, cues second)
2) Weaknesses - Inferences about function are often uncertain (uncertain of goals and intentions) |
|
|
Term
| Functions of Nonverbal Behaviors |
|
Definition
1) Providing information
2) Regulating interaction
3) Expressing intimacy
4) Exercising social control or dominance
5) Facilitating service or task goals (different jobs have different tasks to complete) |
|
|
Term
| Modifying Verbal Messages |
|
Definition
1) Complementing
2) Accenting - 加強語調,放慢速度以致強調
3) Repeating - to repeat a verbal messae, 以手勢來加強
4) Substituting - instead of saying something, you can just use actions
5) Contraicting - 有帶點諷刺 |
|
|
Term
| Assumptions of Expectancy Violations Theory |
|
Definition
1) Expectancies drive human interaction
2) Expectancies for human behavior are leanred
3) People make predictions about nonverbal behavior |
|
|
Term
| Sources of Expectations - Pre-Interactional Expectations |
|
Definition
| Expectations of how you would like others to act |
|
|
Term
Sources of Expectations - Interactional Expectations
|
|
Definition
| Expect how other are "going to" treat you; knowledge or skill learnings during interactions |
|
|
Term
Factors that Affect Appraisals of Expectancy Violations - Threat Threshold
|
|
Definition
Violation of our expectations, tolerance for distance violations
2) Arousal - When something happens that wasn't expected, then attention rises up
3) Communicator Reward Valence - Postitive/negative characteristics of the person who violate the expectations. The sum of the characteristics of a
4) Violation Valance - Perceived negative or positive assessment of an unexpected behavior. Fouces on the deviation of an expectation |
|
|
Term
| Factors that Affect Appraisals of Expectancy Violations - Arousal |
|
Definition
When something happens that wasn't expected, then attention rises up
|
|
|
Term
| Factors that Affect Appraisals of Expectancy Violations - Communicator Reward Valence |
|
Definition
| Postitive/negative characteristics of the person who violate the expectations. The sum of the characteristics of a person and the potential for him or her to carry our rewards or punishments |
|
|
Term
| Factors that Affect Appraisals of Expectancy Violations - Violation Valance |
|
Definition
| Perceived negative or positive assessment of an unexpected behavior. Fouces on the deviation of an expectation |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The process by which you filter and interpret what your senses relay so you can create a meaningful picture of the world |
|
|
Term
| Stage of Perception and Influential Factors - Selection Process |
|
Definition
1)Characteristics of the Perceived; devides what we are going to pay attention to; things we are perceiving
2) Characteristics of the Perceiver
- Point of view
- Present needs/purposes/goals
- Personal relevance
- Expectations (consistent/inconsistent) |
|
|
Term
Stage of Perception and Influential Factors - Organization Process
|
|
Definition
1) Proximity - close together in our own minds
2) Similar
3) Simplicity
4) Experience
5) Exoectations |
|
|
Term
Stage of Perception and Influential Factors - Interpretation Process
|
|
Definition
1) Expectations
2) Relative intensity - experiencing the cues
3) Unique |
|
|
Term
| Perceiving Others - Selection |
|
Definition
1) General Traits
- Used to evaluate everyone
- Articulate
2) Sepecfic Traits
- Used to evaluate only a few people
- Unarticulated
3) Halo Effect
- One positive trait perceived, assume other traits are also positive |
|
|
Term
| Perceiving Others - Organization |
|
Definition
1) Primacy Effect
- Initial information carries the most weight
2) Recency Effect
- Most recent information carries the most weight (impressions) |
|
|
Term
| Assumptions of Symbolic Interaction Theory |
|
Definition
1) Human act toward others on the basis of the meanings those others have for them
2) Meaning is created in interaction between people
3) Meaning is modified throuh an inerpretative process |
|
|
Term
| Self-Concept - Self-esteem |
|
Definition
| Self-esteem refers to how we value our self-concept or who we are |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Self - the ability to reflect on ourselves from the perspective of others (think of who we are based on others' perspectives)
2) I - the subject or acting self that is spontaneous, impulsive and creative (the real self)
3) Me - the object or observing self that is reflective and socially aware |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Imagine how we appear to others
2) Imagine their judgment of our appearance
3) We feel hurt or pride based on these self-feelings |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Living up or down to another person's expectations of us (依別人期望過生活) |
|
|
Term
| Key Concepts in Symbolic Interaction Theory |
|
Definition
1) Mind - the ability to use symbole that have common social meanings, or the way people internalize society (socialized identity)
2) Thought - inner conversations with ourselves that help us to make sense of reality (role-taking: envision yourself in a situation, how you would act) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A prediction about yourself causing you to behave in such a way that it comes true. For instance, if you feel great about your abilities in your communication theory course, then it is likely that you will do well in the course |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Individuals who are significant to us; these people are usually family members, friends, work colleagues, and supervisors. When Roger thinks of his parents' opinion of him, he is deriving a sense of self from particular others |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The attitude of the whole community; viewpoint of a social group or the culture as a whole. The generalized other also gives us a sense of how other people react to us and of general social expectations; influential in developing a social conscience |
|
|
Term
| Impression Formation Heuristics (Short cuts of forming impressions) (啟發式教學法) - Availabiliry Heuristic |
|
Definition
| When we make a judgment about a person that comes easily to mind |
|
|
Term
| Impression Formation Heuristics - Represemtatoveness Heuristic (Stereotype) |
|
Definition
| If the perceived trait that matches the assumption of true descriptions (other traits at the same group) |
|
|
Term
| Impression Formation Heuristics - Simulation Heuristic |
|
Definition
| Try to imaging a person behaving in a particular way |
|
|
Term
| Impression Formation Heuristics - Anchor & Adjust Heuristic |
|
Definition
| Compare people to someone we already know, adjust(the differences in beween) the impression of them in comparison |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Refers to the construction of casual explanations for people's behaviors (what made you the way you behave?)
1) Internal - inheritantto that person that made them the way they behave (Stable)
2) External - something about that situation that forces the behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1) Fundamental Attribution Error (internal)
- When observers explain another person's behavior in terms of internal rather than external causes (find bad excuses people we don't know well)
2) Actor/Observer Effect (external)
- When actors observe their own behavior in terms of external rather than internal causes (we never want to take the responsibility of doing something wrong, we give ourself/family/friends benefits) 找藉口 |
|
|
Term
| Explanation for Attibution Biases |
|
Definition
1) Perceptual Salience - attribute cause to what is most salient in our perceptual field (選擇性看見)
2) Self-Concept Concerns - we are motivated to maintain a stable sense of self (we all have perception of who we are, and we want to maintain it 為錯誤找藉口)
3) Predictability Concerns - make an attribution that allows you to predict what's going to happen next (we live in a world of uncertainty, alllows you to prepare before doing something) |
|
|
Term
| Assumptions of Uncertainty Reduction Theory |
|
Definition
1) Initial interactions give rise to two types of uncertainty in interpersonal settings
- Cognitive uncertainty: doubts/ambiguity you have about this person's thoughts/beliefs
- Behavioral uncertainty - what behaviors we should have in this situation
2) Uncertainty is an aversive state, generating cognitive stress
3) When strangers meet, they strive to reduce their uncertainty and increase predictability
4) Interpersonal communication is the primary means of uncertainty reduction |
|
|
Term
| Phase of interpersonal communication in URT |
|
Definition
1) Entry Phase - beginning moment of interaction, rule-guided stace, norms
2) Personal Phase - communicte more spontaneously and personally, sharing more private information
3) Exit Phase - to decide if you want to continue or end the relationship |
|
|
Term
| Three Information Seeking Strategies |
|
Definition
1) Passive - doesn't involve any overtprocess observational (表面的)
2) Active - engaging interactions with others than person you're interested in (從旁人得知訊息)
3) Interactive - when you go straight to the source (直接下手) |
|
|
Term
| Three Sources of Relationship Uncertainty |
|
Definition
Refers to the doubts that people have about their close personal relatoinships
1) Self Uncertainty - doubt you have of your own involvements in a relatoinship (do I want to be in relationship?)
2) Partner Uncertainty - doubts about partner's involvement in relationship
3) Relationship Uncertainty - doubts about the relationship as its own entity |
|
|
Term
| Information Seeking Strategies in Ongoing Relationships |
|
Definition
1) Secret Tests
- Questioning social network
- Evaluating partner's interest in competitors
- Physical separation
- Reducing relationship rewards (holding sex)
- Labeling the relationship in public
- Indirect references to the nature of the relationship
2) Relationship Talk
- Explicit about the nature of this relationship |
|
|
Term
| Cultural Differences in the Experience of Uncertainty |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Social Penetration(穿透能力) Defined |
|
Definition
1) Social Penetration - the process of bonding that moves a relationship from superficial to more intimate
2) Social Depenetration - the slow deterioration of a close relationship (deeper, more detailed)
3) We accomplish social penetration through self-disclosure - the purposeful process of revealing information about one's self (personal based)
|
|
|
Term
| Components of the Onion Model |
|
Definition
1) Public Image - the outer layers of a person that are visible to others (thin skin; easy to peal off)
2) Private Self - the innermost layers of a person that are only revealed to significant others
3) Breadth - the number of various topics that are discussed in a relationship (shows important information of who we are)
4) Depth - the degree of intimcary that guides topic discussions (不是很多方面的) |
|
|
Term
| Stages of Social Penetration - Orientation |
|
Definition
| We reveal only little bit of ourselves in the public. Only share information that wants to be seen in public (just getting to know each other) |
|
|
Term
Stages of Social Penetration - Exploratory Affective Exchange
|
|
Definition
| Once private starts to become public, more personality engaging (casual friends) |
|
|
Term
Stages of Social Penetration - Affective Exchange
|
|
Definition
| Characterized close friendships and intimate partners (more casual and spontaneous; more private ways) (have inside jokes) |
|
|
Term
Stages of Social Penetration - Stable Exchange
|
|
Definition
| Exchange of raw honesty and intimacy (life-long parner, family) |
|
|
Term
| The Importance of Reciprocity |
|
Definition
1) Reciprocity (相互作用) - the return of openness from one person to another
2) Reciprocity is associated with increased satisfaction and perceptions of equality (more satisfied when equitable; equal amount information of each other) |
|
|
Term
| Rewards and Costs of Self-Disclosure |
|
Definition
1) Reward/Cost Ratio - balance between positive and negative relationship experiences (rewarding or risky disclosure? is it going to be benefitial for me to share this information?)
2) Rewards and costs have a greater impact early in the relationship than later in the relationship
3) Relationships with a history of postivie reward/cost experiences are better able to handle conflicts effectively |
|
|
Term
| Guidelines for Self-Disclosure |
|
Definition
1) Is the other person important to you?
2) If the risk of dislosing reasonable? 3) Are the amount and type of disclosure appropriate
4) Is the disclosure relevant to the situation at hand? (don't share everything all the time) 5) Is the disclosure reciprocated (相互的)
6) Will the effect be constructive? |
|
|
Term
| Characteristics of Close Relatoinships |
|
Definition
1) Mutual Awareness - both people aware of relationship, but doesn't need to put same effort into it
2) Developt through coordinated interaction - different system of communication that characterizes the relationship
3) Analyzed and evaluated as they develop - analyze what it means when your partner say or do
4) Influenced by outside forces - family/friend/other people in our lives
5) Enabling and limiting - positive/negative effects
6) Constructed and maintained through communication |
|
|
Term
| State Models of Relationship Development |
|
Definition
1) Characteristics of individuals drive relationship formation and stability; who you are (preferences) of any given moment and time
|
|
|
Term
Factors affecting attraction
|
|
Definition
- Proximity: closer proximity, bigger chance
- Similarity
- Complementary needs: looking for someone that has complementary needs
- Temporary states: date someone you probably wouldn't date, but because in the same environmment so you start dating; "I need a friend now" |
|
|
Term
| Stage Models of Relationship Development |
|
Definition
1) Different behaviors are enacted as relatoinships develop over time (comfortable stage)
2) Ability to negotiate relational stages determines relationship development (negotiate the transition)
3) Relationship definitions are negotiated through communication |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The ability to affect a partner's outcomes. If Meredith withholds her friendship from LaTasha, she affects LaTasha's outcome. If LaTasha can't replace Meredith as a friend, Meredith's behavior gives her fate control over LaTasha |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The power to change another's behavior. If Meredith calls LaTasha on the phone, it is likely that LaTasha will stop whatever else she is doing and talk to Meredith |
|
|
Term
| Social Exchange Foundations of Commitment and Satisfaction |
|
Definition
1) Comparison Level affects Satisfication
- Ratio of rewards to costs is greater than my expectations for this type of relationship
2) Comparison Level of Alternatives affects Commitment
- Ratio of rewards to costs is greater than my expectations for what I could get from an alternative relationship |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A standard for what a person thinks he or she should get in a relationship. Meredith has a subjective feeling about what she should give and what she should get, in return, from a friendship. Her CL has been shaped by all her past friendships and people around |
|
|
Term
| Comparison Level for Alternatives |
|
Definition
| How people evaluate a relationship based on what their alternatives to the relationship are; it provides a measure of stsability rather than satifcation. Meredith would leave her relationship with laTasha, even thought it is a satisfying one, for something she thinks would be better |
|
|