Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Civil Procedure
Flash cards for cases and statutes from Civil Procedure taught by Amy Wax at Penn Law
72
Law
Graduate
12/11/2015

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Rule 10
Definition
Appellate jxn when: disagreement among lower courts or split in fed circs/state high courts
Term
Strawbridge v. Curtis
Definition
1332 requires complete diversity across "v"
Term
1332(d)
Definition
Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: fed jxn if >$5 mil, >=100 members, and any P from dif state than D
Term
Rule 8(a)1
Definition
P must plead diversity and if D challenges, burden shifts to D
Term
Domicile
Definition
place you're found and intend to remain
Term
Capron v. VanNoorden
Definition
judgments are invalid if court has no SMJ over case
Term
Marbury v. Madison
Definition
Art. III has negative pregnant and original/appellate jxn of SCOTUS don't overlap. Art. III is floor, not exhaustive list... (part about jxn is BAD LAW)
Term
Mas v. Perry
Definition
Domicile is permanent home and place where you intend to remain
Term
Hertz Corp v. Friend
Definition
A corporation's principle place of biz under 1332(c)(1) is its nerve center- where the major activities are directed and controlled by executives
Term
1331 & Art. III, Sec. 2
Definition
fed cts have orig jxn over civil actions arising under federal laws
Term
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
Definition
To sue under 1331, P must assert claim arising under fed law (aka "Well-pleaded complaint rule"); fed law must be necessary to complaint
Term
Harms v. Eliscu
Definition
Holmes Creation Test- suit arises under fed law if the law creates the COA
Term
Osborne v. Bank of U.S.
Definition
Ingredient/But for test- fed jxn if no case but for fed law... BAD LAW (now, must have explicit right to sue and be sued under statute/charter)
Term
Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
Definition
If fed Q embedded in state COA, fed jxn... BAD LAW (now look at Merrell Dow to see what can come in)
Term
Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Definition
no fed jxn even if embedded fed Q... BAD LAW (because put lower courts in disarray after Smith and Moore)
Term
Merrell Dow v. Thompson
Definition
when fed statute embedded in state claim, fed jxn only if fed statute has private right of action (either express or implied [see Cort])
Term
Bivens v. 6 Unknown Agents of FBI DISSENT
Definition
Infers neg pregnant: unless Congress explicitly says COA allowed, none should be allowed
Term
Cort v. Ash
Definition
Implied right of action factors:
1) P especial benefit
2) Legislative intent for remedy
3) Legislative purpose/scheme (is there alt method of relief?)
4) Generally relegated to state law or is fed matter?
Term
Grable v. Darue
Definition
Merrell Dow, sufficient, but not necessary for fed jxn. Can have fed jxn if:
1) fed issue is substantial to case
2) Issue important to fed statutory scheme
3) no floodgates disrupting division btn fed & state cts
Term
Rule 13
Definition
Counterclaim & crossclaim
Term
Rule 14
Definition
Third-party practice
Term
Rule 18
Definition
Joinder of claims
Term
Rule 19
Definition
Required joinder of parties
Term
Rule 20
Definition
Permissive joinder of parties
Term
Rule 21
Definition
Misjoinder and nonjoinder of parties
Term
Rule 24
Definition
Intervention
Term
1367
Definition
Supp jxn
Term
1332(d)(2)
Definition
Diversity rules for class actions cases
Term
Rule 13 compulsory counterclaim
Definition
Arises from same T&O; must be asserted now or RJ effect
Term
Rule 13 permissive counterclaim
Definition
Anything not compulsory (not same T&O)
Term
Cross claims- always compulsory or always permissive?
Definition
Always permissive
Term
Under Rule 14, who can be served and what rules apply?
Definition
Any third party believed to be liable for the claim can be served, and all normal rules for claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims apply
Term
Is Rule 18 compulsory or permissive?
Definition
Both; compulsory if same T&O
Term
When does Rule 19 (required joinder of parties) apply?
Definition
Same T&O and no deprivation of SMJ
Term
Is misjoinder under rule 21 grounds for dismissal?
Definition
No; court may add or drop a party/claim at any time
Term
Rule 24(a)
Definition
Intervention as of right (provided by statute or not allowing would impede party's ability to protect its interest
Term
Rule 24(b)
Definition
May intervene if conditional right by fed statute or claim/defense in common with parties to the suit
Term
Is intervention ever required?
Definition
No; no waiver for not intervening
Term
How can Ds force Ps into a suit if they want?
Definition
Through Rule 19
Term
United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
Definition
Fed courts can hear pendant state claims when attached to a fed claim if same T&O, but up to trial judge discretion (judicial econ, convenience, fairness to litigants, comity with state courts)
Term
Aldinger v. Howard
Definition
Fed cts can included parties against whom state claims are made if hooked to a fed Q claim if no fed statute prohibits jxn and same T&O
Term
Finley v. U.S.
Definition
No supp jxn for state law claims unless allowed by statute... OVERRULED BY FINLEY
Term
Owen Equipment & Erection v. Kroger
Definition
No diversity jxn if at any time there's not complete diversity across the v
Term
1367(a)
Definition
Wide open door that lets in a civil action over which fed ct has jxn and supp claims from same T&O
Term
1367(b)
Definition
Kicks out claims against Ds joined by 14, 19, 20, or 24 OR claims by any P joined under 19 or 24 that break diversity or amt in cont
Term
What is implicitly allowed by 1367's silence?
Definition
1) Any crossclaims, 2) Rule 23 class actions, 3) claims by Ps joined under 20 against defendants, and PROBABLY 4) aggregation, although there's no official word on this
Term
1367(c)
Definition
gives courts discretion to dismiss claims allowed in under 1367(a) and (b); similar to Gibbs factors
Term
1367(d)
Definition
Tolling provision for SoL; extends SoL. Although implies that it applies to claims dismissed under (a), can assume applies to claims dismissed under (a)-(c)
Term
1332(d)(5)(a)
Definition
Local controversy exception for class actions: bars fed jxn when >2/3 of class Ps from same state of filing, >= 1 D from that state, and principle injury occurred in that state
Term
1332(d)(3)
Definition
Gives fed cts discretion to deny a class action in fed ct by assessing factors and a balancing test
Term
Temple v. Synthes Corp
Definition
Joint tortfeasors not required parties under 19(a); are permissive parties under 20
Term
In re Abbott Labs
Definition
Not all Ps need to meet amount in controversy (overrules Zahn)... BAD LAW
Term
Patterson Enterprises v. Bridgestone/Firestone
Definition
If party joined in initial complaint, supp jxn. BAD LAW
Term
U.S. Amicus Brief in Ortega v. Starkist Foods
Definition
Lets in any claims not precluded under 1367(b) even if fail amt in cont or diversity
Term
Exxon Mobil v. Allapatah (Kennedy)
Definition
Lets in any claims not precluded under 1367(b) even if fail amt in cont; does NOT let in claims that fail diversity
Term
Exxon Mobil (Ginsburg)
Definition
Does not let in any claims that don't meet both diversity and amt in cont
Term
1441(a)
Definition
Actions brought in state ct can be removed by D to fed ct of same district/state if could have originally been brought in fed ct
Term
1441(b)
Definition
Actions can be removed only if no D is a citizen of state where action is pending
Term
1441(c)
Definition
Court has discretion to remand in state law pendant cases
Term
Shamrock Oil v. Sheets
Definition
Ps can't remove a state action to fed ct solely because D filed a fed counterclaim
Term
Rose v. Giamatti
Definition
Lack of diversity of citizenship can only defeat removal if the defendant is "real" and not a fictitious entity added just to defeat removal
Term
How can a party attempt to defeat removal jxn?
Definition
1) Add fictitious party (won't work b/c of Rose)
2) Add claim of less than $75k (won't work if added post-removal and used strategically)
3) Additional non-diverse parties (third party D's don't count, though; only 1st party Ds can defeat removal)
4) Additional claims with no supp jxn under 1367
5) Dropping the fed claim (ct can remand under Cohill)
Term
1446(b)
Definition
can file for removal within 30 days after service or receipt of complaint
Term
1446(d)
Definition
must promptly notify all parties for removal and once notified, case is deemed removed and fed ct (must be in same district) has authority unless it remands
Term
1447
Definition
Procedure after Removal (Remand/Review)
Term
1447(c)
Definition
motion to remand must be made within 30 days after removal filing unless for lack of SMJ (can't be waived)
Term
1447(d)
Definition
can't review remands made for procedural or SMJ reasons; can only appeal denials of remands after entire case is over
Term
1447(e)
Definition
court has discretion to deny joinder if it would destroy SMJ, or court can permit joinder and remand to state ct if would destroy SMJ
Term
Thermtron v. Hermansdorfer
Definition
Can review remand if made by discretion and not for lack of SMJ/procedural defect
Term
Carlsbad Tech v. Hif Bio Inc.
Definition
If fed claim exists when filed but eliminated, ct has discretion to hear supp claims or remand; if remand, not b/c of SMJ and is instead discretionary and subject to review
Term
Carnegie Melon v. Cohill
Definition
Court can remand removed cases if all fed claims are removed for reasons of efficiency or fairness
Term
Pennoyer v. Neff
Definition
PJ acquired by personal service in state or voluntary appearance of defendant to contest suit on the merits
Supporting users have an ad free experience!