Term
| What are the five most common congressional grants of SMJ |
|
Definition
1. Federal question jx 2. Diversity jx 3. Supplemental jx 4. Removal Jx 5. Legislative Jx |
|
|
Term
| Can SMJ be waived or agreed upon by the parties? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| When can SMJ be objected to? |
|
Definition
| At any stage of the proceeding, including appeal. |
|
|
Term
| When may a federal court abstain from hearing a case or stay the matter pending state ct resolution when it has SMJ? |
|
Definition
1. Resolution of a state lawissue would eliminate the need for the ct to decide a constitutional issue 2. Avoidance of fed involvement with a complex regulatory scheme 3. The state action involves criminal activity, contempt of court, or civil fine, and the federal court is asked to enjoin that activity. 4. Parallel proceedings that go beyond mere waste of judicial resources |
|
|
Term
| What is federal question jx? Can a state court adjudicate a federal question? |
|
Definition
| It's cases arising under the constitution, U.S. laws, or treaties. Plaintiff must plead the federal cause of action. In determining Fed question, only the cause of action is considered NOT DEFENSES! A state court has concurrent jx unless congress has specifically provided exclusive fed court jx. e.g. bankruptcy |
|
|
Term
| Is there an amount in controversy requirement for federal question jx? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are the three California classifications of subject matter jx? |
|
Definition
Limited civil cases: actions in which the amount in controversy is 25k or less Unlimited civil cases: Actions where the amount in controversy exceeds 25k Small claims cases: Civil actions in which the amount in controversy is 10k or less. |
|
|
Term
| In California, are attorney's fees, interests, and costs included in the calculation of amount in controversy? |
|
Definition
| No. But the court must determine if the verdict will necessarily fall below an amount, and all plaintiff's claims against all defendants are aggregated. |
|
|
Term
| What are the three types of personal jurisdiction? |
|
Definition
In personam-JX over a particular defendant In rem-Jx over a piece of property determining the rights of all persons over a piece of property Quasi-in-rem- Determining the rights of specific persons over specific property. |
|
|
Term
| What are the four situations in which a person may be subject to personal jx? |
|
Definition
1. Physical presence in the forum and service while in the forum. (most states grant immunity to people in the forum for judicial proceedings but not CA) 2. Domicile (where a person maintains their home) 3. Consent-express or implied or through making a general appearance 4. Long arm statutes- CA provides it can exercise jx over anyone it can constitutionally exercise jx over. |
|
|
Term
| How do you establish jx by minimum contacts? |
|
Definition
1. A defendant must have minnimum contacts with the forum. 2. The court must find that through those contacts, the defendant purposefully availed himself of the privilege of conducting activities with the forum state (Is it foreseeable that the contacts would lead to being hailed into court in the jx?) 3. Does the claim arise from the defendant's contacts with the forum? 4. Does subjecting them to jx offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. (Is it difficult and inconvenient for the defendant? Does the forum have a legitimate interest in adjudicating the claim there? What is the plaintiff's interest? Policy?) 5. Does the D have notice?
1. Minimum contacts 2. Purposeful availment 3. Contacts related to claim 4. Fairness 5. Notice |
|
|
Term
| To establish diversity jx, what must there be? |
|
Definition
1. Complete diversity (no one plaintiff and one defendant co-citizens of the same state) 2. Amount in controversy to exceed 75,000 which includes claims, not interest and costs. |
|
|
Term
| When does diversity jx need to exist? |
|
Definition
| At the time suit is filed. |
|
|
Term
| Where is a person a citizen? |
|
Definition
| At the state of domicile (where the person intends to remain or return permanently) |
|
|
Term
| Where is a corporation a citizen? |
|
Definition
| State of incorporation and principal place of business |
|
|
Term
| If a corporation is incorporated in another country and sues another corporation incorporated in another country, but the first corp has its ppb in the USA, does that defeat jx in the USA? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Where is an unincorporated association subject to jx? |
|
Definition
| A citizen of each state of which any member is a citizen. |
|
|
Term
| Can a party create or defeat diversity by making a sham transaction? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How is diversity claimed in a class action? |
|
Definition
| By selecting named plaintiffs to bring claims on behalf of others OR genuinely changing state citizenship after the cause of action accrued but before suit commenced |
|
|
Term
| When can a court exercise supplemental jurisdiction? |
|
Definition
| When the claim arises from the same common nucleus of operative fact as the claim that invoked federal subject matter jx. |
|
|
Term
| If an addition of a party in federal court does not satisfy subject matter jx, what may the court do? |
|
Definition
| Invoke supplemental jx if it arises out of a common nucleus of operative fact. |
|
|
Term
| When a party is substituted, does that defeat SMJ? What about when a party is replaced? |
|
Definition
| No, when a party is substituted, his citizenship is disregarded. When a party is replaced (because plaintiff sued the wrong party) the citizenship of the replacement party controls. |
|
|
Term
| When a 3rd party impleader joins a lawsuit and is not diverse, does that destroy SMJ? |
|
Definition
| Only if the plaintiff is suing the 3rd party defendant. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A claim by one co-party against another. A cross-claim may be asserted if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Impleader is a procedural device before trial in which one party joins a third party into a lawsuit because that third party is liable to an original defendant. The claim must relate too the same transaction or occurrence. |
|
|
Term
| Does a cross-claim need to satisfy diversity jx? |
|
Definition
| Yes, but the court may always exercise supplemental jx. |
|
|
Term
| What is the difference between aggregation to meet the amount in controversy, and exercising supplemental jx? |
|
Definition
Aggregating claims is where all the plaintiff's separate claims can be added against all defendants to satisfy the amount in controversy.
Supplemental is where the amount in controversy is already satisfied and the court determines whether the COA arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. |
|
|
Term
| What is the Erie doctrine? |
|
Definition
A federal court in a diversity case applies its own procedural law, but must apply the substantive law and conflict of laws rules of the state in which it's sitting. If there is a conflict between a state and federal law, the court asks whether the matter is "arguably procedural". |
|
|
Term
| What types of cases will federal courts generally not exercise jx over? |
|
Definition
| Probate and domestic relations. |
|
|
Term
| If a plaintiff has both federal and state law claims, may a federal court exercise pendent jx over both of them? |
|
Definition
| Yes, if they derive from the same common nucleus of operative fact. |
|
|
Term
| Name some statutorily granted claims that must be taken to federal court. |
|
Definition
| 1. Bankruptcy 2. Copyright/patent 3. Where U.S. is a party 4. Antitrust 5. Postal matters 6. Admiralty cases 7. IRS 8. SEC |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| The power of the court to adjudicate the matter before it. In federal court, it relates to the proper district to bring an action. |
|
|
Term
| What is forum non conveniens |
|
Definition
| Where a district court may dismiss an action in favor of a more convenient forum outside the federal judicial system or another district where an action could have been brought. |
|
|
Term
| In general where is venue proper? |
|
Definition
1. A judicial district where any defendant resides. 2. A judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated. 3. If there is no district in the U.S. that satisfies 1/2 a district in which any D is subject to personal JX. |
|
|
Term
| Where is venue proper in an individual? A business? A non-resident of the U.S.? |
|
Definition
Person-any judicial district in which he is domiciled Business entity-Any district in which it is subject to personal jx Nonresident-Any judicial district |
|
|
Term
| Can improper venue be waived? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| When will a court transfer venue even when venue is proper? |
|
Definition
| When there is a more convenient court that the suit could have been filed. |
|
|
Term
| What does venue refer to in CA? |
|
Definition
| Which county the action may be tried. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| When no timely objection is filed. |
|
|
Term
Where is venue proper in CA? Contract actions? P.I. actions? |
|
Definition
In any county in which ANY defendant resides in CA. If no defendant resides in CA, any county in CA. In a contract action-the county in which the obligation was to be performed or where the contract was entered. In personal injury, where the injury occurred. |
|
|
Term
| Actions involving land must be brought in which county in CA? |
|
Definition
| Where the land is located! |
|
|
Term
| In CA, If a defendant in a mixed action is entitled to transfer of venue on one cause of action, the court must... |
|
Definition
| Order a transfer of venue on all causes of action |
|
|
Term
| In CA, Venue is proper against a corporation...a non-incorporated partnership |
|
Definition
Corporation-In the county in which the K was made or to be performed, obligation or liability arises, PPB, or breach occurs. Unincorporated- County of the entity's PPB if the entity's PPB is on file with the secretary of state, if not where any member/partner resides. |
|
|
Term
| When can a court transfer venue even though venue is proper in CA? |
|
Definition
1. When there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had in the original county 2. The convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change 3. There is no judge of the court qualified to act. |
|
|
Term
| When is forum non conveniens proper in california |
|
Definition
1. When the alternative forum is suitable 2. The private and public interest factors balance in favor of another state/county's forum. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Removing the case from state court to federal court. |
|
|
Term
| What are the requirements for removal? |
|
Definition
1. The case could have originally been filed in a federal court. 2. For cases removed on the basis of diversity, no defendant is a citizen of the state where the action is filed. |
|
|
Term
| Can a plaintiff remove a case to federal court? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| When a case involving state and federal question claims is removed to federal court, what must the federal court do? |
|
Definition
| Sever the federal claims and remand the state claims back to state court. |
|
|
Term
| After a non-diverse defendant is severed from the case, can the case be removed? |
|
Definition
Yes. Unless 1. One of the citizens was a state in which the state action was brought 2. With no bad faith on the plaintiff's behalf, one year has elapsed from when the case was commenced in state court. |
|
|
Term
| How long after a defendant receives notice of the suit must he file a notice of removal? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What is remand and who can file it? |
|
Definition
| Remand is a motion by the plaintiff to have the case sent back to the state court after it has been removed. |
|
|
Term
| Does full faith and credit apply to state and federal courts? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| Can a federal court enjoin a pending state court proceeding? |
|
Definition
| Only if authorized by statute to do so. |
|
|
Term
| When may a federal court enjoin a pending state court criminal proceeding? |
|
Definition
| When irreparable harm is imminent and the appellate remedy is clearly inadequate. |
|
|
Term
| When will a federal court abstain and require a litigant to seek relief in state court? |
|
Definition
When 1. The state law is unclear and could be interpreted to avoid the federal constitutional question 2. When there is a state administrative regulatory plan that would be disturbed by the feds taking the case. |
|
|
Term
| In federal court, who can serve process? |
|
Definition
| A non-party who is at least 18 years old. |
|
|
Term
| What are ways to effectuate service in CA? |
|
Definition
1. Personal delivery 2. Substituted service (pre-authorized) 3. Service by mail 4. Service by publication |
|
|
Term
| How can proper service be effectuated by a CA litigant serving someone outside the state? |
|
Definition
| By first class mail, postage prepaid requiring return receipt. (PJ must be met). |
|
|
Term
| Is there immunity from service under any circumstance in CA? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How does a party obtain a TRO? |
|
Definition
1. The moving party states specific facts in an affidavit or verified complaint of the irreparable injury she will suffer if the TRO is not granted. 2. The moving party certifies in writing the efforts she made to notify the adverse party and the reasons why notice should not be required. 3. The moving party provides security to pay for any damages incurred by the adverse party if the court finds he was wrongfully restrained.
Can only be ordered for a maximum of 14-day period. |
|
|
Term
| Do federal court follow notice or fact pleading? California courts? |
|
Definition
Federal courts-notice pleading less specific, must put D on notice. California-fact plading, must be more specific. In Ca, damage amount must be stated with the exception of punitives or PI or wrongful death cases.
Fraud must be pled with specificity. |
|
|
Term
| On what bases may a party file a 12(b)motion? |
|
Definition
1. Lack of SMJ 2. Lack of PJ 3. Improper venue 4. Insufficiency of process 5. Insufficient service of process 6. Failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted 7. Failure to join an indespensible party |
|
|
Term
| In Ca, what is the alternative to a 12(b) motion? |
|
Definition
IN Ca, must file a demurrer General demurrer: 1. Pleading fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action 2. The court lacks SMJ Special demurrer: 1. Lack of legal capacity 2. The existence of another pending action 3. Defect or misjoinder of parties 4. Uncertain pleading (need a more definitive statement) |
|
|
Term
| When must the 12(b) motions be raised? |
|
Definition
SMJ-any time Failure to state a claim or failure to join, any time before trial. All the rest are waived unless brought by the first motion or answer. |
|
|
Term
| What is a motion for a more definite statement? |
|
Definition
| In Ca, a motion for a more definite statement is a special demurrer on the grounds that the pleading is uncertain. |
|
|
Term
| What is a motion to strike? |
|
Definition
| Before responding to a pleading, a party may move to have stricken any insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, or scandalous matter. |
|
|
Term
| What must the answer contain in federal court? |
|
Definition
| A specific denial or admission of each averment of the complaint. Failure to deny constitutes an admission. |
|
|
Term
| When must an answer be served after service of the complaint? |
|
Definition
| Within 21 days if personal service, 60 days if service by mail. |
|
|
Term
| In Ca, how long does a defendant have to file his answer? If he files a demurrer, how long until the answer is filed. |
|
Definition
| The defendant must bring up any demurrable issues in a demurrer. If he answers and brings them up there, he waives them. He has 30 days from service to file an answer or demurrer. If he files a demurrer and it's denied, he gets 10 days. |
|
|
Term
| If someone fails to file an answer, what happens? |
|
Definition
| The court enters a default. |
|
|
Term
| When entering a default, what does the court need to know? |
|
Definition
1. The claim to a "sum certain" 2. The default was entered due to failure to appear 3. The defaulted infant cannot be an infant or incompetent/ |
|
|
Term
| In Ca court, the clerk may enter default if: |
|
Definition
1. The action arises out of a contract or judhment 2. The action is for a "sum certain" 3. The defendant was NOT served by publication. |
|
|
Term
| Is notice required to be given to the defaulted party in federal or state court? |
|
Definition
| Federal court only at least three days before the hearing on the default. |
|
|
Term
| In California, what is a counterclaim called? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What is a compulsory counterclaim (cross-complaint in CA) Permissive? |
|
Definition
A claim that arises from the same transaction or occurrence. It must be pleaded as a counterclaim or it will be thereafter barred.
A permissive counterclaim is any claim not arising from the same transaction or occurrence. It will not be barred by not raising it in the original litigation. |
|
|
Term
| What is a response to an answer called in federal court? CA? |
|
Definition
| A reply in federal court, an answer in CA. |
|
|
Term
| When can an amendment of a responsive pleading occur? |
|
Definition
Once within 21 days of serving it. If the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or pre-answer motion.
In Ca state court, once as a matter of right before an answer or demurrer to the complaint is filed or after the demurrer is filed but before hearing on the issue raised by the demurrer. |
|
|
Term
| When does amendment relate back to the time of the filing of the original complaint? |
|
Definition
| When the new cause of action is based on the same general set of facts as those in the original complaint, the amended complaint will relate back to the filing of the original complaint |
|
|
Term
| May the amendment to a complaint add a defendant? |
|
Definition
If the statute of limitations has not run, generally yes. If the SOL has run, generally not: 1. Mistaken identity in federal court 2. Correcting a mistake in naming a defendant in California state court 3. California sometimes permits a defendant to be sued under a fictitious "Doe". |
|
|
Term
| What are the three questions that must be asked to determine whether joinder is proper? |
|
Definition
1. Should the absentee be joined? Does the absentee have an interest in the subject matter? Is he necessary for complete relief to be accorded? 2. Can the party be joined? If the court has PJ over the absentee and the absentee's presence would not destroy diversity, the party can and must be joined. 3. Should the action proceed without the absentee? If the absentee cannot be joined, the court looks to prejudice to the absentee or available parties and the extent to which such prejudice can be reduced or avoided. |
|
|
Term
| What is the requirement for a class action under federal law? |
|
Definition
1. Numerous number of the class 2. Questions of law or fact common to the class 3. Names parties interests are typical of the class 4. Named parties will adequately represent the interests of the absent members of the class. 5. EITHER separate actions will have inconsistent results OR Defendant has acted or refused to act on grounds applicable to the class OR Common questions of law or fact predominate over individual issues and a class action is superior to alternate methods of adjudication. |
|
|
Term
| Who will be bound by a class action? |
|
Definition
| All members of the class except those who opt out by notifying the court. |
|
|
Term
| When is SMJ established in a class action? |
|
Definition
1. If any class member is diverse from any defendant. 2. If the amount in controversy in the aggregate exceeds 5 million. 3. If there are at least 100 memebers of the class. |
|
|
Term
| When can a shareholder sue to enforce a right of the corporation? |
|
Definition
When 1. He/She was a shareholder at the time of the transaction complained of 2. The action is not a collusive effort to confer jx on the court that it would otherwise lack 3. She made a demand on the directors and if required by state law, on the shareholders. |
|
|
Term
| What are the requirements of a class action in CA?? |
|
Definition
1. An ascertainable class 2. A well-defined community of interest among class members a. Common questions of law or fact b. The class action device will result in substantial benefits to the parties and the court. c. The class representative will adequately respresent the class interests. |
|
|
Term
| What is a California interpleader action? |
|
Definition
| It is instituted by a person in the positioon of a stakeholder to require the adverse claimants to determine which has the valid claim to the stake. |
|
|
Term
| When is intervention proper as of right? |
|
Definition
| When the applicant claims an interest in the property or transaction that is the subject matter of the action and the disposition of the action without him may impair his ability to protect that interest. |
|
|
Term
| What are the initial disclosures required in discovery? |
|
Definition
1. Names, addresses, telephone numbers likely to have discoverable information. 2. Copies or descriptions of documents, electronically stored information and tangible items 3. A computation of dmages and copies of materials upon which the computation is based 4. Copies of insurance agreements under which an insurer might be liable for all or part of any judgment that might be entered. |
|
|
Term
| What is the scope of discovery in Ca? In fed? |
|
Definition
Ca-non-privileged info that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the litigation. Fed- Non-privileged matter that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party. |
|
|
Term
| How can a party obtain work product material in discovery under CA? Under Fed? |
|
Definition
Ca-The party seeking discovery must show that he would be unfairly prejudiced in preparing his claim or defense or that injustice would result Fed-Party seeking discovery must show substantial need or undue hardship. |
|
|
Term
| To protect witnesses from annoyance, embarrassment, or exposure, what must be obtained |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are the factors for determining whether to issue a preliminary injunction? |
|
Definition
1. Whether the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. 2. Whether the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm 3. The balance of equities in his favor 4. Injunction is in the public interest. |
|
|
Term
| With regard to expert witness communications, what may be discovered? In Ca? |
|
Definition
Fed- Party may depose expert witness, but expert reports, drafts, and disclosure are protected, as well as any communications between the party's attorney and expert witness unless they relate to compensation. CA- Party can request all parties disclose expert witness lists, details of trial testimony, and all writings/reports. |
|
|
Term
| What is the plan for pre-trial discovery conferences? UNDER CA? |
|
Definition
Fed- Parties must meet and confer 21 days before scheduling a conference to consider basis of claims/defenses. CA- Court must hold an initial case management conference within 180 days of filing complaint, but no specific meet and confer reqquirement. |
|
|
Term
| How are oral depositions dealt with in fed? CA? |
|
Definition
Fed-Oral depos can take place anytime after mandatory initial disclosure and limited to 10 per party CA-20 day time limit on notice of deposition and no limitation on number. |
|
|
Term
| How are interrogatories dealt with under Fed? Under CA? |
|
Definition
25 written interrogatories per party relating to anything that's non-privileged and relevant to a party's claim/defense. CA: Unlimited form interrogatories and 35 specially drafted. |
|
|
Term
| How long does a party have to produce documents after a request for production? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| When may a person be ordered to submit to a physical or mental exam? |
|
Definition
| When the physical/mental condition is in controversy. |
|
|
Term
| What is a request for admission? |
|
Definition
| A request the other party admits a ccertain fact or opinion of fact |
|
|
Term
| WHat must a party do before making a motion to compel discovery? |
|
Definition
Fed-The other party must have been acting like a dick Ca-must first make a reasonable and good faith effort to formally resolve issues. |
|
|
Term
| What are the sanction rules for CA? Feds? |
|
Definition
Fed-If a party fails to obey a court order, sanctions may be appropriate. Ca- Initial misuse of the discovery process requires monetary sanction,
All subject to abuse of discretion review. |
|
|
Term
| What warrants a voluntary or involuntary dismissal? What are the effects? |
|
Definition
Voluntary dismissal can be filed by the party without prejudice generally. CA-If it's filed after trial begins, it must be with prejudice. Involuntary Fed-When P fails to prosecute or comply with the rules of civil procedure or a court order, D can move to dismiss. If granted, it operates as an adjudication on the merits. CA-Court must dismiss action after 5 years from the complaint being filed, may dismiss after 2 OR 3 years if complaint has not been served. |
|
|
Term
| What is the standard for summary judgment |
|
Definition
No genuine issue as to any material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court construes all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. The burden is on the moving party to show a prima facie case, and then burden shifts to opposing party to set forth specific evidence showing existence of a genuine issue of fact. |
|
|
Term
| When must a summary judgment motion be filed? |
|
Definition
Fed- Any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery Ca- 75 days before hearing date. |
|
|
Term
| What is a declaratory judgment? |
|
Definition
| Court tells parties their rights and responsibilities without awarding damages or ordering parties to do anything. |
|
|
Term
| How many jurors must there be? Ca? fed? |
|
Definition
Fed-at least 6 no more than 12. CA-12 unless parties agree to fewer. |
|
|
Term
| How many peremptories does each party get in a civil case? For cause? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| How does a party get a directed verdict? |
|
Definition
| At the end of a jury trial, before deliberations, a court views all evidence in favor of non-moving party and determines whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding/ whether judgment is warranted as a matter of law. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
If a directed verdict is not granted, movant can file a JNOV Judgment as a matter of law no later than 28 days after entry of trial judgment. Ca- In CA, party does not need to move for directed verdict at trial to use this procedural device. |
|
|
Term
| What will trigger the grant of a motion for a new trial? |
|
Definition
1. Error at trial that renders judgment unfair 2. Newly discovered evidence that existed at the time of trial but was excusably overlooked and would have altered the verdict. 3. Prejudicial misconduct of counsel, a party, a judge, or juror. 4. A verdict that is against the clear weight of the evidence. 5. A verdict that is excessive or inadequate. 6. False evidence. |
|
|
Term
| How long after judgment can a party be relieved of a final judgment on the court's own motion? |
|
Definition
| One year in Fed. Ca has no time limit if it was caused by negligence or mistake of the aggrieved party's attorney. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A final judgment on the merits of an action prevents the parties from successive litigation of an identical claim in a subsequent action. |
|
|
Term
| What is collateral estoppel? |
|
Definition
| Precludes the relitigation of issues of fact or law that have already been necessarily determined by judge or jury as part of an earlier claim. In CA, default, consent judgments are considered to have been actually litigated so as to preclude under this doctrine. |
|
|
Term
| WHat are the four requirements for Removal? |
|
Definition
1. The case could have originally been filed in federal court. 2. All defendants consent 3. Defendant is not a resident of the firum state in which the case was originally filed 4.Removal is sought within 30 days of service of process. |
|
|