Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | type of speech does the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protect; not including hate speech, obscenity or speech that threatens public peace & order |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The void-for-overbreadth doctrine |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | prohibits a law from criminalizing behavior which is protected by the Constitution and is usually raised to address First Amendment concerns. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the Equal Protection Clause |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | A law which criminalized the sale of beer to males under 18 and females under 21 would violate |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | whether a person of ordinary intelligence is able to understand what the law means. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The test of whether a statute or law is void for vagueness is |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | Laws that infringe fundamental rights such as the First Amendment's freedoms of speech and press are subjected to ________ by the courts, which means, in effect, that they are presumed to be unconstitutional. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the freedom of association and assembly |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In addition to freedom of speech, the First Amendment also protects |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | is a principal required by the 8th Amendment |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The principle of proportionality |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | could sometimes violate the Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishment clause as disproportionate punishment was found in this case & why |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In Ewing v. California, the court held that claims of very harsh imprisonment, including life imprisonment |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | this is the right to be let alone by the government |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The Court has held that the right to privacy |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the majority can make anything criminal as long as the Constitution isn't violated. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In a constitutional democracy |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The constitution limits governments' ability to create law and punish offenders. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | is a central feature of criminal law in a constitutional democracy |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | individuals cannot be punished for a crime unless a criminal law exists prohibiting the crime. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | (according to) The principle of legality (translated form) |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | promotes human autonomy because it allows people to know and choose to obey the law, prevents government officials from enforcing laws they think should exist but do not exist, allow people to know in advance what behaviors are criminal. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | (All support) The ban on backdated criminal lawmaking |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | creating a crime which will take effect upon the passage of the law. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | An example of a crime which does NOT violate the ex post facto ban is |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the government can regulate expressive conduct such as nude dancing (was found in what case?) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In Barnes v. Glen Theatre |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The right to privacy is not specifically mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The NOT ONE Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides the right to privacy. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | decided that Heller's Second Amendment rights were violated by the District of Columbia's handgun bans |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In the 2008 case, District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | To prevent the government from punishing a person for conduct that was lawful when it was performed,The prohibition against bills of attainder, There is no crime without law, no punishment without law. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | ALL are aspects of the principle of legality |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The government must give prior notice of what it considers a crime. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | not an aspect of the principle of legality |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | require the involvement of juries in the sentencing phase of a case when the judge wants to impose a sentence greater than the guideline sentence. (was found in what case?) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The impact of Apprendi v. New Jersey was to |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the trial court did not abuse her discretion in departing from the federal sentencing guidelines. (was found in what case?) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | In the 2007 case of Gall v. United States the U.S. Supreme Court decided |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | In reversing the death sentence, the U.S. Supreme Court based its decision on |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | a change in public opinion. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The "evolving standards of decency" analysis espoused by the court in Trop v. Dulles (1958) has been used by the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | whether the death penalty should to certain classes of offenders. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The right to privacy is a implied |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | One of the aspects of the principles of legality is to allow the government to not retroactively |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | punish a person for conduct that was lawful when it was performed but is now criminal. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The test of void-for-vagueness involves both a citizen's ability to understand what is prohibited by the law, and the |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | the restrictions on government's arbitrary application of a vague law. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The imminent danger requirement includes present danger (the constant threat of danger). |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | statements regarding self-defense or defense of others that is CORRECT |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | In using self-defense or defending others, a person can use |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | the amount of force reasonably believed necessary, including deadly force. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The rule of defense of property and habitation used in most states is that |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | one may use reasonably force, but not deadly force, to defend one's property and one's home. (reasonable) |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | be found guilty on a lesser included offense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | (when presented with)An imperfect defense may allow a defendant to |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | In the case of People v. Goetz, the court had to determine |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | whether New York's law on self defense required objectively reasonable belief that force was necessary |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | You are defending against deadly force |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | NOT a requirement of self defense |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | REQUIREMENTS of self defense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | You are defending against unlawful force, You are defending against an unprovoked attack ,You are defending against an imminent attack |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | By raising ________ defenses, the defendant admits the responsibility for the act but claims he did the right thing. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | By raising ________ defenses, the defendant admits what he did was wrong but claims he isn't responsible for what he did. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | (type of defense)requires the defendant to put on some evidence supporting a justification or excuse. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | the time for defense is right now. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The general rules or law of self defense allows |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | retreat if you reasonably believe you are in danger of serious bodily injury.  (what rule?) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The retreat rule requires that you must |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The "retreat to the wall" rule |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The gist of the "castle exception" is that |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | you are allowed to protect your home |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | cohabitants do not have to retreat when faced with unlawful force by another cohabitant. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The cases in the text support the proposition that |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The defense of others defense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | allows individuals to use force to protect another when the persons being attacked could have legitimately used force to defend themselves. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The new castle exception laws |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | extend the right to use force beyond the confines of one's home. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The choice of evils defense is similar to self defense and defense of others, defense of habitation in that it involves |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | necessity to prevent some sort of imminent harm |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | the defendant made the right choice (is key to what defense?) |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The right to use force in the defense of one's person, family, habitation, lands, or goods is one of |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | natural and unalienable rights |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | An initial aggressor can only use force in self-defense if they completely withdraw from the attacks |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Historically, a person could only use force to defend another person if |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | that person was a family member. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Although the home is a special place, many jurisdictions still do not all the use of xxx  in defense of habitation |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | In order for consent to be a valid defense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | the person who consented to the act must have given knowing consent. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | As long as the "victim" gave voluntary, knowing, and authorized consent, the defendant will be able to successfully defend by raising the justification of consent |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | depending on the type of behavior he/she engaged in. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The Irresistible Impulse Test |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | is the insanity rule which excuses a person whose mental disease makes it impossible to control their conduct |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | You are a bank employee and are forced at gunpoint to divert funds into a special account. Failure to cooperate will result in the execution of your family. After complying you are arrested for stealing the funds. Which of the following defenses would your attorney most likely employ? |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Whether the officer created intent in one who was not predisposed to commit the crime. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | reflects the test of entrapment |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | is NOT a required element of the excuse of duress |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The person must have acted under the great emotional stress of the threat. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Entrapment is OR is not a constitutional defense. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Syndrome defenses are generally |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | When voluntary intoxication evidence is not permitted as a complete defense to a crime, it may nevertheless be admitted to |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | show a lack of an intention or purposeful mens rea |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The excuse of age involves a determination of whether |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | the child is old enough to have the capacity to understand and commit the crime. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | a defense used when a defendant's mental state reduces capacity to understand crime. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Attacking the state's ability to prove that the defendant had the mens rea to commit the crime |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | is a failure of proof argument and does not require the defendant to prove anything. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Insanity is a ________ term |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Of the defendants who are successful with their insanity plea, most "go free." so the incorrect thought would be |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
         | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | blackmail; death threats, imminent harm and reasonable belief are. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | One common feature found in each of the three primary tests of insanity employed by the states is |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | whether the defendant suffered from a mental disease or defect. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The trend with regard to proving insanity is |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | to require the defendant to bear the burden of producing evidence of insanity which then must be overcome by the state. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Are diminished capacity and diminished responsibility the same thing? |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | NO, they are not the same thing but may be used incorrectly. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | In State v. K.R.L. the court held that |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | The state didn't overcome the presumption that K.R.L. was too young to have committed the offense. |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | an example of a syndrome defense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | road rage, ptsd, pms symptoms |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | not an example of a syndrome defense |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The Model Penal Code approach to insanity is |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | a combination of the M'Naghten test and the irresistible impulse test |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Under the Model Penal Code test of insanity, a person is not responsible for criminal conduct if because of a mental disease or defect the person lacks xxx to appreciate the criminality of the act or conform conduct to the requirements of law. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The xxx of entrapment asks whether the conduct was an unpleasant police method that tempts an ordinarily law-abiding person |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Generally the claim of involuntary intoxication is allowed as a defense in most jurisdictions. However, the claim of voluntary intoxication, when allowed, |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | is usually limited to reducing the mens rea element |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Generally, the defense of duress cannot be raised if the offense charged is one of . |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | Although it is often raised in homicide cases, the insanity defense can be |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
        
        | raised for other charges as well. See for example, the case of Lorena Bobbit |  
          | 
        
        
         | 
        
        
        Term 
        
        | The right-wrong test is xxx another name for the Model Penal Code test of insanity. |  
          | 
        
        
        Definition 
         | 
        
        
         |