Shared Flashcard Set

Details

Cases
Exam Review
26
Law
Graduate
10/05/2013

Additional Law Flashcards

 


 

Cards

Term
Humphrey v Cody
Definition
Civil Commitment involves a “massive curtailment of liberty” as serious as those faced by a convicted criminal
Term
O’Connor v Donaldson
Definition
The state cannot constitutionally confine a nondangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely by himself or with the help of willing and responsible family members or friends
Term
Olmsted v LC
Definition
Least restrictive alternative
Term
Addington v Texas
Definition
Sets clear and convincing standard and burden
Term
Wyatt v Stickney
Definition
Right to Treatment
Term
US v Dusky
Definition
A defendant is not competent to stand trial if by reason of mental illness or mental defect, he lacks substantial capacity to assist counsel with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or lacks a rational or factual understanding of the proceedings against him.
Term
Godinez v Moran
Definition
Files motion to discharge counsel and change his plea to guilty. Court allows him to do so. He’s found guilty and sentenced to death. After his conviction and after a period of treatment with antidepressant meds he files motion to overturn his conviction based on competency to waive the right to counsel is a higher standard than Dusky standard.
Term
Washington v Harper
Definition
Criminal Defendant can be medicated against his will if the proposed treatment is:
1) medically indicated and he poses a substantial risk of harm to others
2) gravely disabled
3) a substantial governmental interest

**Note no provision for those who are just incompetent to make medical decisions.
Term
Sell v US
Definition
Must balance the intrusion (liberty interests) against the potential sentence.
Term
Frye v US
Definition
Sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance by the relevant scientific community
Term
Daubert v Dow Pharmaceuticals
Definition
Scientifically Valid and can reasonably be applied to the case
Term
Riggins v Nevada
Definition
Involuntary medication absent a finding of:

1) incompetence and the need to medicate defendant to make him competent
2) imminent risk of harm to self or others
3) grave disability

- violates the due process right to liberty.
Term
Weston v US
Definition
Can medicate but case focuses largely on Dangerousness, not Substantial Governmental Interest
Term
Brown v Mississippi
Definition
Vacated conviction of 4 Black men convicted of murder who confessed after being beaten.
* Competency to Confess
Term
Fikes v Alabama
Definition
Did the Totality of the Circumstances deprive the defendant of his will to resist the police?
Term
Bordenkirsher v Hayes
Definition
Prosecutor threatens to charge as **habitual offender if he did not plead guilty and accept 5 year sentence. ** Not Coercive.
Term
Brady v United States
Definition
Guilty plea to **murder w/ sentence of life if death penalty not pursued. **Not Coercive
Term
Colorado v Connelly
Definition
- In spite of Miranda warnings and repeated reminders that he did not have to talk, he persisted in giving police incriminating evidence.
- Psychiatric evaluation stated that he confessed in response to “command delusions” and that the confession was coerced (not knowing and voluntary)
Term
Miranda v Arizona
Definition
- Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination. Waiver “knowing and voluntary”
- Free will v determinism: How hard did the police make the decision vs. was the defendant psychologically capable of resisting?
Term
Whalem v United States
Definition
Concept of responsibility is a foundation of criminal law such that when a defendant is obviously not responsible insanity defense must be part of the case. Overturned US v Marble
Term
Frendak v United States
Definition
Defendant’s decision not to raise insanity defense must be followed if CST. Defendants must be allowed to make fundamental decisions about proceedings. This is the most accepted view.
Term
Saddler v United States
Definition
Sentencing must be postponed if the judge has reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant may not have a level of awareness sufficient to understand the proceedings or to exercise his right to allocate.
* Competency to be Sentenced
Term
Chavez v United States
Definition
Defendant must understand the nature of the proceedings and be able to participate intelligently to the extent that participation is necessary
Term
Ford v Wainwright
Definition
Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment bans execution of the “insane.” Unaware of the punishment they are about to receive or unaware of why it is being carried out.
Term
Durham v United States
Definition
The defendant is not legally responsible if by reason of duress of mental disease he had so far lost the power to choose between right and wrong, that his free agency at the time was destroyed and at the same time the alleged crime was so connected with the mental disease in relation of cause and effect as to have been the product of it solely.
Term
MacDonald v United States
Definition
- Recognizing that the Durham court defined neither mental disease or product, provided a definition of mental Disease: "any abnormal condition of the mind which substantially affects mental or emotional processes and substantially impairs behavioral controls”
- First addition of irresistible impulse criteria
Supporting users have an ad free experience!