Term
| What are the 3 elements of an agent/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
1. Assent
2. Benefit
3. Control |
|
|
Term
| What is the definition of "assent" for the purposes of an agency/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
An agreement to create an agency/principal relationship between a principal who has capacity and her agent (agent's capacity is irrelevant)
Must be voluntary and consensual.
No consideration required. |
|
|
Term
| What is the definition of a "benefit" for the purposes of the agency/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
| Agent's conduct is for principal's benefit and furthers principal's objectives. |
|
|
Term
| What is the definition of "control" for purposes of the agency/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
| P must have the right to control A by having the power to supervise the manner and method of A's performance. |
|
|
Term
| When does P have an agency/principal relationship with a sub-agent? |
|
Definition
ABC's must be met:
1. Assent: agent must have been authorized to hire sub-agent to do the work
2. Benefit: sub-agent must have been hired for principal's benefit
3. Control: principal must have power to supervise sub-agent's performance (unlikely) |
|
|
Term
| When does P have an agency/principal relationship with a borrowed agent? |
|
Definition
ABC's must be met.
Unlikely that control factor will be satisfied for a borrowed agent - usually it's the lender, not the borrower, who has the right to supervise borrowed agent's performance. |
|
|
Term
| What do courts consider in determining whether principal is liable for independent contractor's torts? |
|
Definition
Factors:
1. IC has a separate business/occupation
2. IC is being paid for limited period of engagement
3. IC is supplying own tools and facilities for the job
4. Parties' understanding was that IC would be IC rather than agent
5. Local customs re: supervision of work |
|
|
Term
| When can a principal be held liable for an independent contractor's torts despite lack of control? |
|
Definition
1. IC's acts are inherently dangerous - ultrahazardous exception
2. Estoppel: P creates appearance of agent/principal relationship and 3rd party relies on it
3. P delegates non-delegable duties to IC - e.g., duty to make premises safe to invitees
4. P knowingly selects an incompetent IC |
|
|
Term
| When are principals liable for the torts of their agents? |
|
Definition
1. An agent/principal relationship was created
2. The tort was committed within the scope of the agent/principal relationship |
|
|
Term
| What is considered in determining whether something falls within the "scope" of the agency/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
1. Was the conduct the kind A was hired to perform?
2. Did A intend to benefit P in the course of the conduct?
If A had 2 objectives, it will be w/in scope of r/s if benefit to P was a substantial objective of her conduct. |
|
|
Term
| 3 specific instances of conduct NOT in scope of agency/principal relationship: |
|
Definition
1. Invitations to unauthorized passengers while A is performing w/in scope of A/P r/s
2. A using substantially different instrumentalities from the ones P authorized to complete the task
3. Commuting |
|
|
Term
| When is P vicariously liable for A's intentional torts? |
|
Definition
General rule: not liable - 3 exceptions:
1. Intentional tort was authorized by P
2. Intentional tort was natural incident of carrying out P's directions
3. Intentional tort was motivated by desire to serve P |
|
|
Term
| When is P liable for A's misrepresentations? |
|
Definition
| When A has actual, apparent, or implied authority to make statements concerning the subject matter misrepresented. |
|
|
Term
| When can P ratify A's torts? |
|
Definition
When P has knowledge of all material facts.
Ratification renders P vicariously liable for A's tort. |
|
|
Term
| When is P liable for contracts entered into by A? |
|
Definition
When A was authorized by P to enter into a contract.
4 kinds of authority: actual express, actual implied, apparent, and ratified |
|
|
Term
| What is actual express authority? |
|
Definition
P's words expressly authorizing A to enter into K on P's behalf.
General words granting authority are narrowly construed.
No writing requirement UNLESS power involves K re: an interest in land for more than a year. |
|
|
Term
| How can express authority to enter into a K be revoked? |
|
Definition
1. Unilateral act of either A or P
2. Death of P
3. P's incapacity
Exception: express authority NOT invoked by P's incapacity if P gave A a durable POA
4. Lapse of specified or reasonable time or happening of specified event
5. Change in circumstances (e.g., destruction of subject of r/s, insolvency of A or P) |
|
|
Term
| What is actual implied authority? |
|
Definition
Authority that P gives A through conduct or circumstance.
|
|
|
Term
| Under what circumstances can implied authority arise? |
|
Definition
1. Necessity: tasks necessary to complete an expressly authorized task
2. Custom: tasks customarily performed by persons w/ A's title or position, unless specifically directed otherwise
3. Prior dealings: tasks A reasonably believes she is authorized to do based on P's prior acquiescence
CMR: implied authority includes emergency measures, power to settle litigation, power to delegate ministerial tasks, power to delegate when customary or necessary, acceptance and payment of goods when A has authority to purchase |
|
|
Term
| When does A have apparent authority? |
|
Definition
Two-part test:
1. P cloaked A w/ appearance of authority
2. 3rd party reasonably relied on appearance of authority |
|
|
Term
| How does P cloak A w/ appearance of authority (first prong of apparent authority)? |
|
Definition
P did something to hold A out as someone w/ authority to act on P's behalf
1. Secret limiting instruction: P holds A out as having authority, but secretly limits A's authority, and A exceeds it - P is liable
2. Lingering authority: P terminates A's authority but A continues to act as if she has it - P is liable until 3rd parties receive actual or constructive notice of A's termination |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
P ratifies K after A enters into it - 3 requirements
1. P has knowledge of all material facts
2. P accepts the benefits of the K
3. P does not modify the terms of the K in accepting |
|
|
Term
| Who is liable for a K in an agency/principal relationship? |
|
Definition
P (and not A) is liable for all authorized contracts.
A (and not P) is liable for all unauthorized contracts. |
|
|
Term
| What is an undisclosed principal? |
|
Definition
A who acts on behalf of P who is either partially disclosed (3rd party knows A is acting on behalf of someone, but not who) or undisclosed (3rd party doesn't know A is acting on anyone's behalf)
In these cases, 3rd party can elect who to hold liable - A, P, or both
NY: undisclosed Ps are NOT liable on negotiable instruments |
|
|
Term
| What duties does A owe to P? |
|
Definition
1. Duty of reasonable care - A has to inform P what is going on
2. Duty to obey reasonable instructions (but no duty to obey illegal instructions)
3. Duty of loyalty |
|
|
Term
| What does the duty of loyalty prohibit? |
|
Definition
1. Self-dealing: A can't receive a benefit to P's detriment
2. Can't usurp P's opportunities
3. Can't make secret profits: can't profit from transaction arising out of agent/principal r/s without informing P of the profit |
|
|
Term
| What remedies does P have against A for breaching a duty? |
|
Definition
| Damages for losses caused by A's breach, disgorgement (only for secret profits?) |
|
|
Term
| What duties does P owe to A? |
|
Definition
1. Reasonable compensation
2. Duties imposed by their K
3. Reimbursement |
|
|