Term
|
Definition
| THE FORM AND MEANING OF AN ASSERTION |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A STATEMENT USED IN THE FORMULTATION OF AN ARGUMENT; ALSO CALLED A PREMISE |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| THE CONTENT OF A PROPOSITION; THE AFFIRMATION OR DENIAL THAT SOMETHING IS SOMETHING ELSE |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| CONCEPT FORMATION; THE EXPRESSION OF AN ARGUMENT IN WORDS (TERMS) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| AN ARGUMENT FORM CONSISTING OF TWO (2) PREMISES AND A CONCLUSION |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| AN INTERRELATIONSHIP DERIVED FROM TWO OR MORE PROPOSTION; USUALLY INDICATED BY THE KEYWORD, THEREFORE |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
COMPOUND PROPOSITION CONSISTING OF TWO (2) PRIMISES SEPERATED BY THE KEYWORD, OR THE TWO PREMISES ARE ALSO KNOW AS, DISJUNCTS
Either premise 1 or premise 2 disjuctive premise
Not premise 1 categorical premise
Therefore premise 2 conclusion
|
|
|
Term
| RULES OF VALIDATION(Disjuctive Syllogism) |
|
Definition
a. categorical premise denies (contradicts) one of the disjuncts
b. conclusion affirms the other disjunct of the disjunctive proposition |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
TWO PREMISES CONTAINED WITHIN AN IF-THEN CLAUSE. The premise following the if keyword is the antecedent and the premise following the then keyword is known as the consequent. |
|
|
Term
| THE PREMISE FOLLOWING THE "IF" KEYWORD IS THE _________ AND THE PREMISE FOLLOWING THE "THEN" KEYWORD IS KNOW AS THE ________ |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| PURE HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM |
|
Definition
IF THE SYLLOGISM CONTAINS THREE (3) IF-THEN PROPOSITIONS, THEN THE SYLLOGISM IS KNOW AS A
If premise 1 (antecedent) then premise 2 (consequent)
If premise 2 then premise 3
Therefore if premise 1 then premise 3 |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A SYLLOGISM THAT CONTAINS ONE HYPOTHETICAL PROPOSITION, ONE CATEGORICAL PREMISE, AND A CONCLUSION,(THEREFORE)
If Premise 1 then Premise 2
Categorical proposition
Therefore (relationship between the first two propostion) |
|
|
Term
| Rules of validation(Pure Hypothetical Syllogism) |
|
Definition
a. Only one premise and the conclusion have the same antecedent
b. The other premise and conclusion have the same consequent
c. The consequent of the first premise is the same as the antecedent of the second premise |
|
|
