Term
| Argument from Classification |
|
Definition
|
The warrant identifies a characteristic or class of category Class to Specific
|
|
|
Term
| Argument by generalization |
|
Definition
|
What is true in these causes is probably true of cases (or generally) -able to general from a smaller set of instances to a larger set.
|
|
|
Term
| Caused to Effect Argument |
|
Definition
|
Grounds: X has Happened Claim: Y has happened Warrant: X causes Y
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
Grounds: Y has Happened Claim: X has happened Warrant: Y is caused by X
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
Grounds: In instance A, X Claim: In instance B, X Warrant: B is similar to A in Essential Respect
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
The person is worthy to believe because of his credibility
|
|
|
Term
| Applying Model to Argument |
|
Definition
|
Find the claim. What does the arguer want you to believe, value, or do Look for the grounds. On what basis am I supposed to buy into this claim? Look for the Warrant, how did you get from those grounds to the claim? Then look for other Parts of the Argument
|
|
|
Term
| Standards for a good argument |
|
Definition
|
Acceptibility Relevance Sufficiency
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
The argument has to seem like it is worthy of Belief
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
The grounds that are introducedfor the claims to be relevant
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
taking argument as a whole is enough -One case cannot generalize
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
General Standards to question an argument
|
|
|