Term
|
Definition
|
Claim and its supporting reason
Interaction marked by disagreement
-Even though they are distinct they are not mutually exclusive
|
|
|
Term
| Justification vs. Correctness |
|
Definition
|
Claim could be correct even if the justification is bad
Ex. The Cubs will win the WS because the sky is blue
Claim could be wrong but justification is good
Ex. the car will be reliable because it gets routine check ups
|
|
|
Term
| Justification vs. Persuasiveness |
|
Definition
|
Persuasive, but not justified
Justified but not persuasice
No good counter arguments so it becomes null
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
state advanced for the acceptance of others.
-Conclusion or point of Argument but it is not necessarily at the end
-Ex. You should vote for this candidate
It usually begs a reason
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
state advanced for the acceptance of others.
-Conclusion or point of Argument but it is not necessarily at the end
-Ex. You should vote for this candidate
It usually begs a reason
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
the specific information is relied on to support the claim.
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
general statement that justifies using the grounds for the basis for the claim
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
Statement that provides backing for the grounds or the warrant
-Ebert is a reliable source as is a newspaper
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
Statement that identifies possible exceptions
-Usually to the warrant
--The warrant would not hold truth in this claim, thus there is a rebuttal
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
a word/phrase that indicates the force/strength with which a claim is advanced
Ex. Certainly this would happen...
We should DEFINITELY see Cars
We should PROBABLY see Cars
MAYBE we should see Cars
IT IS POSSIBLE that we should see Cars
|
|
|