Term
| What are the elements required for adverse possession? |
|
Definition
1. Actual Entry
2. Exclusive
3. Open and Notorious
4. Adverse
5. Claim of Right
6. Continuous for Statutory Period |
|
|
Term
| What is the standard used to determine whether actual entry has occurred? Objective or subjective standard? |
|
Definition
| The AP must enter and use land in a manner that the average true owner would use that land for in that area. It is an objective standard. |
|
|
Term
| What is the standard by which to judge the Open and Notorious element of adverse possession? |
|
Definition
Majority
- Sufficient to put the average owner on notice
- Owner's knowledge is irrelevant
Minority/Mannillo Exception
- ACTUAL knowledge required if:
1. Minor encroachment
2. Along a common boundary |
|
|
Term
| What are the three possible interpretations of the claim of right requirement necessary for adverse possession and how do they work? |
|
Definition
1. Objective: state of mind is irrelevant.
2. Good Faith Standard: AP must believe that he is not trespassing for the entire statutory period.
3. Bad Faith Standard: AP must know he does NOT own the land but intend to take possession away for the entire statutory period. |
|
|
Term
| What is tacking? When is tacking permitted in consideration of adverse possession? What is the minority approach? |
|
Definition
Tackin allows a subsequent adverse possessor to add the time the previous adverse possessor had occupied the land to their own time of possession in consideration of Contintuous for Statutory period element of adverse possession. It is permitted only if the two adverse possessor's are in privity.
Minority:
If subsequent adverse possessor kicks original AP off, but leaves and original comes back later, original can tack two times together. |
|
|
Term
| What is a direct restraint on alienation? What is the remedy? |
|
Definition
| A direct restraint on alienation is clear language that prohibits the sale or transfer of a fee simple interest. These are void. The remedy is to strike the condition. |
|
|
Term
| What is an indirect restraint on alienation? What is the remedy? |
|
Definition
| A condition that imposes a restriction that restrains alienability while not expressly prohibiting it. These are valid UNLESS they have a material adverse affect on marketability. If FMV is affected, strike the condition, not the interest. |
|
|
Term
| When are malicious conditions void? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are the elements necessary to establish a vested remainder? |
|
Definition
1. Given to at least one ascertained person
2. Not subject to a condition precedent (that is, capable of coming into possession at the end of the preceding estate) |
|
|
Term
| What is a vested remainder subject to divestment? |
|
Definition
| A VRSD is a vested remainder that is subject to a condition subsequent. In other words, when the elements of a vested remainder are met but it is possible that an event occurring AFTER they take possession could result in the loss of the interest to another party. |
|
|
Term
| What is a SHIFTING executory interest? |
|
Definition
An interest divesting the interest of another TRANSFEREE.
Ex: To B(h), but if C ever goes skydiving, then to D.
D has a shifting executory interest. |
|
|
Term
What is a SPRINGING executory interest?
|
|
Definition
A springing executory interest is an interest that divests the TRANSFERROR following a gap in time during which NO OTHER TRANSFEREE has a right to possession.
Ex: To B(h), if C ever returns from France.
If, at the time that the estate preceding B expired C had not returned from France, O would retake the property until C returned from France. B would thus have a springing executory interest. |
|
|
Term
| What future interests are subject to the rule against perpetuities? |
|
Definition
| Contingent remainders, vested remainders subject to open and contingent executory interests. |
|
|
Term
| When will a class gift be valid under RAP? |
|
Definition
1. Class must be closed
2. Conditions must be resolved for ALL present and future members. |
|
|
Term
| What must be met for a class gift to valid under RAP? |
|
Definition
1. Class must be closed at the end of the preceding estate.
2. All or Nothing Rule: conditions must be resolved for ALL present and future members. |
|
|
Term
| Who should be used as the validating life in gifts to an IDENTIFIED person? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| In gifts to an unspecified child, what is the worst case scenario for purposes of RAP? |
|
Definition
| Kill the parent during childbirth. |
|
|
Term
| What is a major policy benefit of joint tenancy? |
|
Definition
| Since the death of a joint tenant results in an automatic right of survivorship in the other joint tenants, no need to have an expensive and drawn out probate proceeding. |
|
|
Term
| What are the four unities and what do they mean? |
|
Definition
1. Time
- Interests of each joint tenant must be acquired or vest at the same time
2. Title
- All JT must acquire title by the same instrument
3. Interest
-Must have equal and undivided shares and identical interests for an identical duration
4. Possession
- Right to possession of the whole |
|
|
Term
| What is the result if a joint tenant sells his interest to a third party? |
|
Definition
| The third party would have a tenancy in common with the other joint tenants. The seller's interest is gone completely (poof). |
|
|
Term
| How can the "strawman" technique be used to sever joint tenancies? |
|
Definition
If a joint tenant desires to destroy the time and title unities, the JT can convey his interest in the joint tenancy to a strawman, who will then convey the property back to the joint tenant who is now a tenant in common.
MINORITY: In CA, strawman is unncessary. JT can grant himself his own property, thus destroying time and title. |
|
|
Term
| What happens if a joint tenant mortages the property? Does it destroy the joint tenancy? Does the mortgage affect the other joint tenants? |
|
Definition
| A mortgage does NOT sever a joint tenancy, since the bank only has a lien/mortgage on the property as COLLATERAL and does not possess it, therefore keeping the unities intact. Furthermore, the upon the mortgaging JT's death, the mortgage ENDS since JT's interest has gone "poof" (ie, never existed). |
|
|
Term
| What happens if a joint tenant defaults on a mortgage of the property? |
|
Definition
| In some jurisidictions, bank foreclosure would sever the interest of the mortgaging joint tenant. In other jurisdictions, the bank's interest in the property would vanish upon the JT's death. |
|
|
Term
| What happens if a joint tenant leases their interest? |
|
Definition
| This is valid and does not destroy a joint tenancy. However, if the JT dies while the property is still being leased, the dead JT's interest vanishes and the other joint tenants inherit it and can thus kickt he lessee off. |
|
|
Term
| What is a tenancy in the entirety? |
|
Definition
| A tenancy in the entirety is, in essence, a joint tenancy with a fifth unity: marriage. |
|
|
Term
| What percentage interest does each tenant in the entirety have in the subject property? How does this affect creditors? |
|
Definition
| Each tenant in the entirety has a 100% interest in the property. Creditors cannot reach the interests of the other spouse unless both spouses mortgage the property. |
|
|
Term
| What are the two kinds of partition actions that can be brought? Who types of tenancies can bring them? |
|
Definition
1. Partition in kind
2. Partion by sale
These can be brought by any tenancy BESIDES tenancies in the entirety, since TE's each have a 100% interest in the property. |
|
|
Term
| What happens during each of the kinds of partion actions? What is the default? What two reasons justify following the method that is not the default? |
|
Definition
1. A parition in kind physically divides the property between the co-tenants into equal parts. This is the default.
2. A partition by sale is justified if:
1) Physical attributes of property make partition by kind impratical or inequitable. Consider:
- Geography/Topography
- Multiple cotenants
- Tenants don't get along/can't share
2) Intersts of the owners would be better seved by sale. Consider:
- Reduced marketability of land
- However, also consider sentimental attachment (speaks against partition by sale) |
|
|
Term
| When one cotenant is occupying the property and the other is not, does the occupying cotenant owe rent to the other? If so, under what circumstances? |
|
Definition
No, generally an occupying cotenant does not owe rent. However, if there is an agreement or ouster, rent is required.
Ouster requires:
MAJORITY: Denying entry/access.
MINORITY: Demand letter for rent/denying access |
|
|
Term
| What are the four types of leasehold estates and what are their terms? Is notice required to terminate? |
|
Definition
1. Term of years
- Lease lasting for a predetermined period of time
- Notice of termination is not necessary
2. Periodic Tenancy
- Establishes intial period and then a renewal period (ie one year lease followed by month to month)
- Notice is required since continuation is implied.
a. 6 months required for year to year
b. If less than a year, must be given equal to the length of the time period but cannot exceed 6 months
c. Must terminate on final day, not in the middle of the period
3. Tenancy at Will
- No time span
-Can unilaterally terminate
- Most statutes require 30 day notice
4. Tenancy at Sufference
- Tenant remains in possession after termination of the tenancy
- Termination is at discretion of landlord
- Notice is not required |
|
|
Term
| What does the implied warranty of habitability cover? What if the tenant assumed the risk? |
|
Definition
| The implied warranty of hability applies to all housing and establishes a duty for landlord to maintain safe, clean premises fit for human habitation in residential housing. It covers ALL latent dfects of facilities vital to use. Assumption of risk/waiver is IRRELEVANT. |
|
|
Term
| If there is a breach of the implied warranty of habitability, what must the tenant do before filing suit? |
|
Definition
1. Notify landlord of defects IF UNKNOWN to landlord.
2. Allow a reasonable time for correction. |
|
|
Term
| What can a tenant due if the implied warranty of habitability has been breached and the notice requirements to the landlord have been met? What are the damages and how are they calculate? |
|
Definition
1. Tenant may stop paying rent until defects are cured.
2. Tenant may still pay rent and sue for damages after vacating premises.
3. Tenant may break lease and abandon property.
Damages:
Compensatory
- FMV of dwelling MINUS actual value of dwelling in defective condition OR
- Actual rent paid minus actual value of dwelling in defective condition
Pain and Suffering
Punitive
Annoyance and Discomfort damages sometimes available |
|
|
Term
| What type of discrimination is prohibited by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and what types of property interests did it implicate? |
|
Definition
| The CRA prohibited discrimination based upon race and in purchases, inheritance, sales and leases. |
|
|
Term
| How can a plaintiff demonstrate a violation of the Fair Housing Act? |
|
Definition
| By demonstrating discriminatory IMPACT--intent is not necessary. |
|
|
Term
| Under the Fair Housing Act, what categories of discrimination are prohibited? |
|
Definition
| Race, Sex, Religion, National Origin, Disability and Familial Status |
|
|
Term
| Section 3604(b) of the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in... |
|
Definition
| Terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rent |
|
|
Term
| Section 3604(c) prohibits discrimination in... |
|
Definition
| The priting and publishing of statements and advertisements indicating preference |
|
|
Term
| Section 3604(d) prohibits discrimination in... |
|
Definition
| Any misrepresentation about the unavailability of a dwelling when in fact is was available |
|
|
Term
| Section 3604(e) of the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in... |
|
Definition
| For profit, to induce any person to sell or rent by representations that certain groups will enter the neighborhood. Targets white flight |
|
|
Term
| Section 3603(b) provides which exception to the blanket discrimination clauses contained within the Fair Housing Act? What is the exception to this exception? |
|
Definition
It provides that the Act does not apply to:
1. Single Family homes being sold/rented by an owner that
2. Does not own more than three such houses
3. Only one such sale in a 24 month period has occurred
OR
Owner occupies one residence in a building with no more than 4 total single-family dwellings
A 3604(c) violation, even if perpetrated during the course of one of the above exceptions will be grounds for violation of FHA.
|
|
|
Term
| What is a race statute? Is notice relevant? |
|
Definition
| A race statute awards title to the individual who records the property interest first, regardless of notice or who acquired possession/title first. |
|
|
Term
| What is a notice statute? |
|
Definition
| A notice statute protects subsequent purchasers who do not have notice of a prior purchaser regardless of whether that prior purchaser recorded their interest or not. |
|
|
Term
| What is a race-notice statute? |
|
Definition
A race notice statute protects subsequent purchasers of property from prior interests if
1. Subsequent purchaser does not have notice of the prior sale
2. The subsequent purchaser records their instrument of sale before the prior purchaser.
|
|
|
Term
| In the absence of any recording statute, what is the common law rule regarding multiple instruments of title transfer? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Record notice is present when a buyer knows of an interest affecting their property as a result of an inquiry into the recorded title of the subject property. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Inquiry notice exists when an interest (easement, servitude, etc) is so obvious as to put subsequent purchaser on notice to inquire as to its existence. |
|
|
Term
| What is an affirmative easement? |
|
Definition
| A servient easement is an easement granted by a servient owner to a dominant party giving them the right to enter and perform an act on their property. |
|
|
Term
| What is a negative easement? |
|
Definition
| A negative easement is an easement that forbids an owner from doing something on his land that might harm a neighbor. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A license is permission to visit th eproperty of another. They are revocable at the will of the licensor. This a major difference between licenses and easements. |
|
|
Term
| What elements are necessary to imply an easement by estoppel? |
|
Definition
1. Reliance
- The use of the property must be necessary if improvements are used to demonstrate reliance
- The easement itself must be improved or used to make improvements upon the land
2. Reliance must be reasonable
3. Knowledge (JX approach)
- Owner must know or permit the reliance
|
|
|
Term
| What are elements necessary to imply an easement by prescription? |
|
Definition
| The same elements as adverse possession. However, under "Exclusive Use" element, the question is whether the owner has interfered with the claimant's use of the easement. |
|
|
Term
| What the elements necessary to establish a public prescriptive easement? |
|
Definition
1. Long, continuous use by public
2. According with proper claim of right
3. Owner must be put on notice that public, not individuals are using the easement |
|
|
Term
| What types of negative easements are deemed to run with the land? |
|
Definition
1. Block windows
2. Prevent air flow in a defined channel
3. Remove support of building
4. Interfere with the flow of water in an artifical stream |
|
|
Term
| How can an easement be destroyed? |
|
Definition
1. Release
- Contract
2. Merger
-Dominant and servient estates are merged by servient estate owner
3. Estoppel
-Reliance by servient estate on dominat estate's representation that easement will not be used
4. Abandonment
-Unequivocal manifestation of intent to abandon
- Words alone insufficient
- Non-use alone is insufficient |
|
|
Term
| What are the elements necessary to show that a real covenant runs with the land? |
|
Definition
1. Statute of Frauds
2. Intent to Run with the Land
3. Privity
- Horizontal
-Vertical
4. Touch and Concern
5. Notice |
|
|
Term
| When is vertical privity required to establish a real covenant? Anything else? |
|
Definition
It is required for both the benefit and burden to run in a real covenant.
For a benefit to run, SOME interest in land must be transfered between the prior owner and the current.
For a benefit to run, the interest in land that is passed must be identical to the previous owner. |
|
|
Term
| How is horizontal privity established? When is horizontal privity required? |
|
Definition
Horizontal privity is established when the original covenanting parties have a successive relationship with each other or through a grantee/grantor relationship.
Horizontal privity is required when a party is attempting to establish that a burden runs with the land. |
|
|
Term
| Are courts more likely to find touch and concern with affirmative or negative covenants? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What is the remedy after establishing that a real covenant runs with the land? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What is the remedy after it is established that an equitable servitude exists and has been violated? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
| What are the elements necessary to establish the existence of an equitable servitude? |
|
Definition
1. Statute of Frauds
2. Intent to run with the land
3. Touch and concern
4. Notice of covenant
5. Privity (horizontal and vertical) (JX Approach) |
|
|
Term
| If the statute of frauds is not met, how can a plaintiff imply that an equitable servitude exists on the land? |
|
Definition
1. Original common owner
2. Common scheme
3. Intent for covenant to apply
- Infer from surrouding properties
4. Notice
5. Touch and Concern
6. Privity (JX approach) |
|
|
Term
| In a Common Interest Community (ie, condos), restrictions that were contained in the original declaration that has been recorded are presumed reasonable unless... |
|
Definition
1. Restriction is arbitrary
2. Violates public policy
3. Burden to owner substantially outweighs the benefit to the community |
|
|
Term
| What the elements necessary to establish a private action for nuisance? |
|
Definition
1. Invasion
-Non-physical trespass
2. Unreasonable
-Weigh gravity of harm versus the value of actor's conduct
3. Intent
-Purposefully causing harm OR
-Knoweldge of harmful effects OR
- Substantially certain of harmful effects |
|
|