Term
| Major concepts investigated in philosophy. |
|
Definition
Cause.
Justice.
Matter.
Mind.
Consciousness. |
|
|
Term
| Main Fields of Philosophy. |
|
Definition
Ethics.
Epistemology.
Metaphysics.
Logic.
History of Philosophy. |
|
|
Term
| Special Fields of Philosophy. |
|
Definition
Philosophy of Mind.
Philosophy of Religion.
Philosophy of Science.
Subfields of Ethics.
Philosophy of Art.
Philosophy of Language. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Associated with thinking.
Reasoning.
Using information to arrive at completion.
Using inferences. |
|
|
Term
| Nature of reasoning & critical thinking. |
|
Definition
| Using information to draw a conclusion, solve a problem, and make a decision. |
|
|
Term
| Two meanings of “argument”. |
|
Definition
Case sense of argument and has relevant information to the conclusion suggested.
Disputable sense of argument and has irrelevant information to the conclusion suggested. |
|
|
Term
| Feature of arguments of particular interest in logic. |
|
Definition
| The inference structure, as opposed to context in arguements. |
|
|
Term
| Two main evaluative questions about arguments and examples. |
|
Definition
Are the premises true?
Are the premises properly related to the conclusion?
I.E. Are the premises relative.
Do the premises support the conclusion? |
|
|
Term
| Conclusion and premise indicators. |
|
Definition
Premise indicators are statements of evidence.
Conclusion indicators are a case for/against some point. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| A logically successful way of finding the relations between the premises and conlusion, sufficient to support the conclusion. |
|
|
Term
| Main questions of requirements of knowledge in Epistemology. |
|
Definition
What is knowledge?
Where is the source of knowledge?
What is the scope or extent of our knowledge? |
|
|
Term
| What epistomological theory first proposed by Plato is Ayer's theory closely related to? |
|
Definition
| The Justified Truth Belief Theory. |
|
|
Term
| Two main approaches to knowledge. |
|
Definition
Someone reaches a true conclusion with accredited basis for it.
I must be completely sure of what I think I know or claim to know. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Questioning the standard's model and it's justification.
Trying to say “What if I could replicate someone having a true belief that’s justified, but still doesn’t have knowledge?”
Making a scientific philosophy test run.
Show that these requirements aren’t enough for knowledge. |
|
|
Term
| Two main approaches to knowledge. |
|
Definition
Someone reaches a true conclusion with accredited basis for it.
Must be completely sure of what I think I know or claim to know (the certainty). |
|
|
Term
| Name the three requiments of knowledge. |
|
Definition
Truth.
Justification.
Belief. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
| Facts and statements that can't be argued with. |
|
|
Term
| What is the difference between the truth and logical correctness? |
|
Definition
| One investigates the set up of the arguement, while the other one decares its point and what it is arguing. |
|
|
